....lots of people work in the Public Sector and I don't see many of those voting Conservative. It's not only because of the 'hit' on pay, pensions and conditions but also because of the reduction in the service offering to the public.
LOL. You have no evidence for this whereas I have provided the evidence for the exact opposite. The NHS is the most cost effective healthcare system in the world according to the latest research.
Where do they express this view? Certainly not in that link.
The prime minister said the comments by Freud, who suggested that some disabled people could be paid as low as £2 an hour, did not represent the view of the government. But Cameron showed anger when he alluded to his severely disabled late son, Ivan, as he told Miliband that he would take no lectures on disabled people.
The angry exchanges came as Miliband disclosed the remarks by Freud in answer to a question at the recent Tory conference in Birmingham about paying the minimum wage to disabled people. The Labour leader quoted Freud as saying to his questioner at the fringe meeting: “You make a really good point about the disabled. There is a group where actually, as you say, they’re not worth the full wage.”
Asked by Miliband whether that was his view, the prime minister said: “No, absolutely not. Of course disabled people should be paid the minimum wage and the minimum wage under this government is going up and going up in real terms. It is now at £6.50. We will be presenting our evidence to the low pay commission, calling for another real terms increase in the minimum wage.”
Miliband then quoted further from Lord Freud, who added that he was looking at “whether there is something we can do if someone wants to work for £2 an hour”. Amid cries of “outrage” and “shame” from the Labour benches, Miliband said: “Surely someone holding those views can’t possibly stay in his government.”
Cameron said: “Those are not the views of the government, they are not the views of anyone in the government. The minimum wage is paid to everybody, disabled people included.”
With his voice rising in anger, the prime minister added: “Let me tell you: I don’t need lectures from anyone about looking after disabled people. So I don’t want to hear any more of that. We pay the minimum wage, we are reforming disability benefits, we want to help disabled people in our country*, we want to help more of them into work. And instead of casting aspersions why doesn’t he get back to talking about the economy.”
Our Prime Minister there, using his tragically deceased disabled son at a time of bother again, this time during PMQs when asked about Lord Freud's encouragement of paying disabled workers £2 p/h.
*= demand they get back to work even if they are on their deathbed.
Our Prime Minister there, using his tragically deceased disabled son at a time of bother again, this time during PMQs when asked about Lord Freud's encouragement of paying disabled workers £2 p/h.
*= demand they get back to work even if they are on their deathbed.
What a [Poor language removed] of a thing to say.
Our Prime Minister there, using his tragically deceased disabled son at a time of bother again, this time during PMQs when asked about Lord Freud's encouragement of paying disabled workers £2 p/h.
Are we meant to remain passive whilst he uses it as a get out of jail free card? It is the second time in two weeks that he's tried to use him for his political gain.
It is disturbing.
I agree.
No one, including his political opponents, will deny the personal tragedy and suffering he and his family have been through both before and after the passing of his child.
However to use it as a means of deflecting criticism of the Government's treatment of those with disability or more generally in need of care is cowardly in my opinion.