The Everton Board Thread

[stevie blott]

But we need to replace them well. Didn’t feel like football people were coming in

Trivial pursuit people could come in..... Who cares !!! At least someone would get a sport question right

 

[DualityNSNO]

Do I have to change it,Really?

Nah just wondering mate.

 

[DualityNSNO]

Majority shareholders hold a majority of voting rights. So if MSP hold the majority of shares, they control who is on the board. So if they wish to remove Bill and Denise, then they're gone

Any deal with the devil is a tricky one and I honestly think that Kenwright will somehow keep plaguing us until he actually kicks it.

 

[Exeter_Gently]

Nah just wondering mate.

One eye on the telly,one eye on the forum...Jesus wept.

 

[Furey1878]

People are saying "bye Bill and Denise", but we all know they're both not moving or selling shares and only Moshiri's majority will be touched here. Anything else is pure copium.

Nothing wrong with them being shareholders as long as they are off the board. They will then have the same rights as any other shareholder.

 

[Titus Shambles]

One eye on the telly,one eye on the forum...Jesus wept.

 

[Exeter_Gently]

View attachment 212340

Quite

 

[DualityNSNO]

Nothing wrong with them being shareholders as long as they are off the board. They will then have the same rights as any other shareholder.

As I said, deal with the devil and all that, might be that they remain.

Hope not like but...

 

[dockroad]

Nothing wrong with them being shareholders as long as they are off the board. They will then have the same rights as any other shareholder.

Kenwright has 1,750 shares . DBB isn't listed so we don't know how many shares she has or indeed if she has any at all .

 

[Neiler]

This strikes me as odd.

Be curious to see the final figures.

 

[MikeH72]

People are saying "bye Bill and Denise", but we all know they're both not moving or selling shares and only Moshiri's majority will be touched here. Anything else is pure copium.

Bill and Denise are employees and can be sacked whenever the owners wish them to be.

 

[Taifi gorm]

Nothing wrong with them being shareholders as long as they are off the board. They will then have the same rights as any other shareholder.

'Blue' Bill sat asking questions of the board at a shareholder meeting, trying to take over proceedings and getting dogs abuse would be great to watch.

 

[DualityNSNO]

Bill and Denise are employees and can be sacked whenever the owners wish them to be.

On paper yes, in reality - probably not for some crap reason

 

[Blue peter]

This strikes me as odd.

Be curious to see the final figures.

Why does it strike you as odd?

 

[Titus Shambles]

On paper yes, in reality - probably not for some crap reason

Said 'crap reason' is because they are board members and we are required to have a minimum of 3 people on the board. Should others come on to the board once any investment deal is signed, then they could be moved out.