The Everton Board Thread

[davek]

Everton play for 2 hours every week Dave.

So for the other 166 hours, can you explain why we cant protest the Board?

You know what: it gives our players and staff the impression what their fighting for is a chaotic mess. And it aids thre opposition to think they take to the field agianst an organidation savaging itself in a civil war.

This isn't rocket science. This is obvious stuff.

The likes of NSNOW arer going to be willfully sabotaging any chance we have of getting clear of relegation.

 

[davek]

It's only done when Bill Kenwright is out of the door and all his lackeys with him

No statues or stands named after him at BMD. As he's hanging around for

Wiped clean. Entirely.

With professional. Experienced. Credible people with integrity brought in.

Until then. Its not done.

Yeah great...and we'll have that victory standing in the rubble of our PL status....but we got rid of an inconsequential clown called Bill Kenwright.....Hurrah!

 

[BlueToff]

You know what: it gives our players and staff the impression what their fighting for is a chaotic mess. And it aids thre opposition to think they take to the field agianst an organidation savaging itself in a civil war.

This isn't rocket science. This is obvious stuff.

The likes of NSNOW arer going to be willfully sabotaging any chance we have of getting clear of relegation.

No, they aren't.

They did everything they could to ensure that protest did not impact the team on Saturday. Fans turned up for the bus welcome, and supported the team until the final whistle. This team is crap, largely full of crap players with a largely crap manager, who can't get results.

 

[Davideeyore]

not sure if anyone has uploaded this but I found it interesting.

Spiffing podcast. Both talked really well.

 

[Damo_1878]

Yeah great...and we'll have that victory standing in the rubble of our PL status....but we got rid of an inconsequential clown called Bill Kenwright.....Hurrah!

As if you can leave it to Bill Kenwright for that?

 

[davek]

No, they aren't.

They did everything they could to ensure that protest did not impact the team on Saturday. Fans turned up for the bus welcome, and supported the team until the final whistle. This team is crap, largely full of crap players with a largely crap manager, who can't get results.

They knew they couldn't deliver on that. That's because they have no control over the forces they helped unleash. Which is why they bricked it when the bin lids were chasing down players cars like Alsations outsidde Goodison.

If that lot want to grandstand and show the media they can bring down an Everton board then great...just park it until we're safe...because I tell you one thing: if we get relegated they'll be just as harshly judged by history as that rancid defucnt board they seek to topple right now.....the movers and shakers of that group better be prepared for that. I for one will deliver that judgement to their doorstep.

 

[jinkyali]

Hes probably said quite a lot without saying very much there

Asked whether, in the event of being sacked after the West Ham match, he would feel he had been able to do the job to the best of his ability, Lampard replied: “That’s a tough one. I’ve absolutely given it everything that I can and it’s not one for me to analyse all the circumstances. I’m sure it is your job!”


Telling...

 

[Tommy.]

What I will say is that they're good writers who have been hung out to dry by poor subbing and a rush/need to be 'first out'.

The Athletic's subs are absolutely dreadful. They miss out errors, they miss out facts, they must not actually sub work. And for that headline to go out the way it initially did caused problems.

It's alright for Ornstein - who, btw, is a good guy - but his name on stuff doesn't really matter when he's not the journalist for the club. Greg got it in the neck, and so did Paddy who wasn't even working at the game.

Now, where the lads did IMO let themselves down, but it doesn't at all condone any abuse (and that's what the club wanted, division in the fanbase, and at the end of the day they are fans) is that follow-up piece in midweek where they, seemingly without challenge, let the unnamed source - that's fine, most sources are unnamed but we should all have a pretty good idea of who it is - double-down on the Baxendale thing.

None of us actually know if it's true or not. My gut feeling is that something might have happened that wasn't actually an issue at all at the time. However, certain people at the club - and again, we should all know who this is - have saved for a later date and to weaponise.

The club have got it outstandingly wrong. The Athletic's editors and subs did with that initial headline and piece, which they subsequently corrected, and their writers then did by not challenging their source enough, IMO.

I agree with a lot of this mate but the bolded part is a hard no.

They haven't corrected anything; they hugely contributed to slandering dozens of thousands of decent fans and I'm yet to see a full and committed apology from that rag or the writers.

 

[Damo_1878]

They knew they couldn't deliver on that. That's because they have no control over the forces they helped unleash. Which is why they bricked it when the bin lids were chasing down players cars like Alsations outsidde Goodison.

If that lot want to grandstand and show the media they can bring down an Everton board then great...just park it until we're safe...because I tell you one thing: if we get relegated they'll be just as harshly judged by history as that rancid defucnt board they seek to topple right now.....the movers and shakers of that group better be prepared for that. I for one will deliver that judgement to their doorstep.

"That lot" includes me and @MaupsGoat

My conscience is clear. Very clear. I'm acting in the best interests of the Football Club.

 

[jinkyali]

What I will say is that they're good writers who have been hung out to dry by poor subbing and a rush/need to be 'first out'.

The Athletic's subs are absolutely dreadful. They miss out errors, they miss out facts, they must not actually sub work. And for that headline to go out the way it initially did caused problems.

It's alright for Ornstein - who, btw, is a good guy - but his name on stuff doesn't really matter when he's not the journalist for the club. Greg got it in the neck, and so did Paddy who wasn't even working at the game.

Now, where the lads did IMO let themselves down, but it doesn't at all condone any abuse (and that's what the club wanted, division in the fanbase, and at the end of the day they are fans) is that follow-up piece in midweek where they, seemingly without challenge, let the unnamed source - that's fine, most sources are unnamed but we should all have a pretty good idea of who it is - double-down on the Baxendale thing.

None of us actually know if it's true or not. My gut feeling is that something might have happened that wasn't actually an issue at all at the time. However, certain people at the club - and again, we should all know who this is - have saved for a later date and to weaponise.

The club have got it outstandingly wrong. The Athletic's editors and subs did with that initial headline and piece, which they subsequently corrected, and their writers then did by not challenging their source enough, IMO.

Paddy name was on the original article wasn't it?

They've corrected nothing and hopefully they realise how played they are and how meaningless their position is in the world of journalism.

 

[jinkyali]

"That lot" includes me and @MaupsGoat

My conscience is clear. Very clear. I'm acting in the best interests of the Football Club.

Me too.

NSNO_W have done more than most.

 

[davek]

"That lot" includes me and @MaupsGoat

My conscience is clear. Very clear. I'm acting in the best interests of the Football Club.

You've done it. The war is won. The Everton board - such as it was - is obliterated in the eyes of the football world in this country and they cant go to attend matches. There isn't a chance in heaven that board make a comeback at this club. If some people at the top of the protest groups want to continue to create an air of crisis, that's not in the best interests of this club.

Just what the point is of focussing on Headlockgate at the expense of Relegationgate I dont know.

 

[jinkyali]

You've done it. The war is won. The Everton board - such as it was - is obliterated in the eyes of the football world in this country and they cant go to attend matches. There isn't a chance in heaven that board make a comeback at this club. If some people at the top of the protest groups want to continue to create an air of crisis, that's not in the best interests of this club.

Just what the point is of focussing on Headlockgate at the expense of Relegationgate I dont know.

Taking the foot off the pedal is not an option.

 

[Damo_1878]

Me too.

NSNO_W have done more than most.

@MaupsGoat confirm. I never let up after Crystal Palace or all Summer on this incompetent, deceitful, arrogant selfish disingenuous board.

I've been at them every day for months

I'm thankful the true colours of the so called board including Bill Kenwright and Denise Barrett Baxendale have been revealed to everyone now

Fact is. If we don't get them out it'll be next season.... Davek will again be saying "Park It" then. Like last season.

No Dave. No. Enough is enough. Deal with the problem now.

 

[Damo_1878]

You've done it. The war is won. The Everton board - such as it was - is obliterated in the eyes of the football world in this country and they cant go to attend matches. There isn't a chance in heaven that board make a comeback at this club. If some people at the top of the protest groups want to continue to create an air of crisis, that's not in the best interests of this club.

Just what the point is of focussing on Headlockgate at the expense of Relegationgate I dont know.

See my last post.

My simple answer to you is : No