You are still incorporating the fans into the media frenzy of the word toxic.
My earlier post looked at the root of this & the reaction which you fail to acknowledge.
Again did the board envisage the reaction to be what it was ?
If they did and it was calculated , then then that puts them in an untenable position & signifies there is far deeper problems within the club.
This is not on the fanbase mate.
My point isn't about who started it, its the impact of the confrontation. The two forces coming together and what it created and the impact - thats where we differ.
I also dont accept that the majority of the "fans" are part of the protest group in fact the minority are rightly or wrongly - the majority of the fans may want to bring about change in the administration of the club - i do - but that doesn't mean all fans are on board with what happened with the timings, logics, leaderships, events and decsions etc in January.
Take myself and Dave as a sample - we've made good reasoned points in this thread - the protest group doesn't speak for or represent all fans, lets be clear on that and not put everyone other that one banner. They aren't above critique - nor i assume would they want to be.