I reckon I could deal with any news other than a Michael Keane contract extension.No idea if they are on wind up or what. Didnt mean to create panic. Apologies.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I reckon I could deal with any news other than a Michael Keane contract extension.No idea if they are on wind up or what. Didnt mean to create panic. Apologies.
Dave, Roma were a basket case club mired in huge debt and losing money hand over fist when he took them over, he's now got them turning a profit whilst actually massively improving them on the field.That's EXACTLY what Friedkin's game was. A piece of that stadium.
Just another parasite.
Never put your faith in Everton's 'experts' who called these people 'serious players'.
I called that Friedkin lot out as chancers right from the off. They were struggling to keep spending at Roma and all of a sudden they have the cash to pick up our debt, pay Moshiri off and bankroll a PL football club...it was strictly for the birds.
A lot of people fell for it though, so don't be surprised when they're conned again.
That's projecting ahead with some certainty. I'm not sure you're right, tbh.He'll be the owner here inside the next 6-12 months btw, the paying off of the two genuine (none fleecing us) loans showed commitment (both loans interest are reported to be lower than any we had btw), the fact he walked on seeing the 777 mire in detail simply put is a holding tactic to avoid being caught up in it's fallout - it'll also allow him to get the club for a lower eventual price (which again is a good thing).
I think that was down to Covid in regards to him initially pulling out of the Roma deal.Didn't Dan Friedkin walk away from the Roma negotiations in exactly the same way? Then 2months later he was their owner. If Moshiri is in any way interested in a sale, he will need to need to offer up a better deal than he wants to. Might happen, might not, but either way, I'd expect Dan Friedkin hasn't fully walked away yet.
How about a new five year deal for Maupay?I reckon I could deal with any news other than a Michael Keane contract extension.
I'm inclined to think he will return as well, but it will be drawn-out. It's what happens in the interim that's the issue, and failing to keep the squad quality and depth above the relegation water-line. Who is going to fund working capital.Dave, Roma were a basket case club mired in huge debt and losing money hand over fist when he took them over, he's now got them turning a profit whilst actually massively improving them on the field.
He did it through cutting a huge amount of the 'waste', restructuring bad loans and paying most off, streamlining the club how it operates and striking actual competitive commercial and sponsorship deals.
He's not the typical leverage buyout yank loading debt onto a club to gain control.
In terms of owner - short of a sports washing operation he's literally one of the best types of owner a club could have.
I know you're sceptical but there's nothing in this guy's background that rings any alarm bells, he's very much a rarity in terms of billionaires as he operates very much above board in the interest of the entity he controls.
He'll be the owner here inside the next 6-12 months btw, the paying off of the two genuine (none fleecing us) loans showed commitment (both loans interest are reported to be lower than any we had btw), the fact he walked on seeing the 777 mire in detail simply put is a holding tactic to avoid being caught up in it's fallout - it'll also allow him to get the club for a lower eventual price (which again is a good thing).
I could ride that out haHow about a new five year deal for Maupay?
That's projecting ahead with some certainty. I'm not sure you're right, tbh.
If the money is not the issue, maybe Moshiri could pay off the A-Cap loan and take on any fall out/liability down the line (which he should as he engineered the situation). Then add that cost onto the purchase price, so he gets the £200 million back but the new owners have no association or relationship with A-Cap?
If the money is not the issue, maybe Moshiri could pay off the A-Cap loan and take on any fall out/liability down the line (which he should as he engineered the situation). Then add that cost onto the purchase price, so he gets the £200 million back but the new owners have no association or relationship with A-Cap?
Like he has 200m.Again, you’re giving him too much credit in assuming he’s clever enough to think of that.
I'm inclined to think he will return as well, but it will be drawn-out. It's what happens in the interim that's the issue, and failing to keep the squad quality and depth above the relegation water-line. Who is going to fund working capital.
My concern is that TFG and others think that relegation is a scenario they can live with, and look to pick the club up then and just think we'll recover and all will be ok.
We can't continue to operate as we have been with punitive debt interest costs. We don't know what leeway there is about paying off A-Cap and whether Moshiri will have to stump up some off that. I can see why there is reticence about a new buyer paying it all off even if the escrow solution is viable.
Like he has 200m.