I expect better from you.
They've been at the German-Polish border lately protecting the fatherland from bedraggled refugees.
Who has?
I knew you'd reference Chemnitz.
This was an 8,000-strong angry march in response to a local being murdered by refugees, in an area not known for such murders. It was countered by a 65,000 self-proclaimed "anti-nazi" march.
Among that 8,000 were some wronguns: actual far-right racist types who wanted to go wild on innocent random foreigners.
Horrible...i agree. But not indicative of
"the far-right having a foothold over the old DDR".
For these reasons:
- the vast majority of the 8,000 protestors were angry concerned citizens, outraged at what happened. But according to police-estimates not members of any particular far-right organisation or with history of such.
In total: 4 people were arrested: 3 of them refugees (for murder) and 1 German for racist violence against a jewish restaurant.
15 individuals (from 8,000) are believed to have belonged to an active neo-nazi scene, and in total 79 individuals were identified as causing damage or using racist threatening language...from 8,000.
Think of the Chemnitz Protest as a mini-version of a BLM riot, where some wronguns get involved.
And don't forget the instant counter-protest of almost ten times as many people, which on its own counters any argument that the smaller group has any kind of foothold.
I knew you'd reference Chemnitz, as that's the only one that ever gets referenced. The media portrayed it as a "far-right neo-nazi" protest, and thus many outsiders will know it as such. The media also latched onto comments by a couple of AfD members and artificially-conflated them to mean AfD support neo-nazi sentiments. Those AfD members merely stated that
the protests (note: not the far-right minority violence) were "understandable": i.e. a protest against a violent murder perpetrated by supposed war-fleeing refugees receiving all manner of support, a protest of which a small fraction were confirmed "far-right neo-nazi"...and which were condemned by the same AfD members (which naturally went unreported).
The media shape the narrative. You know this sort of thing goes on.
You wrote the following (emphasis mine):
The eastern concentrated AfD are to be seen marching with neo-nazis at anti-immigrant events in Germany
Source that AfD marched with neo-nazis?
Event
s plural...got any more other than the Chemnitz one which everyone references?
As I said earlier: a more illuminating debate is why the media & political establishment go all-in on attacking the AfD.
In short: they're an anti-establishment party. That will not do in todays' Brave New World.
Disclaimer: i vote FDP myself, finding AfD not voteworthy due to my classing them as a protest-party rather than a serious option for governance. But they're not the far-right neo-nazi bogeyman. And they don't have any kind of foothold as they're not even in the coalitioned regional governments.
The AfD is an anti-immigration and anti-Islamic party.
They are not. Don't believe the hype.
Straight from the horse's mouth:
Drucken
www.afd.de
Maybe you can inform us why the AfD are opposed on the streets by anti-nazi groups in Germany?
Because these self-proclaimed "anti-nazi" groups believe the AfD are made up of nazis...because the media & political establishment told them so.
The media shape the narrative.
Maybe they have it wrong? Maybe the AfD didn't march side by side with Pegida?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-election-afd-idUSKCN1BU1GQ
Look at
The Narrative. Look at the opener:
---- "
Supporters of both movements stood side by side waving Germany’s black, red and gold flag - a public demonstration of the fellow feeling between AfD and hardline PEGIDA" ----
Not long ago, in 2006 while we hosted the World Cup, there was a big debate at how we've got back our national pride and weren't shy waving the 'black, red and gold"...that this positive nationalism was a good thing, and long may it continue.
We were always at war with Eastasia!
This march you reference numbered in total just over 2,000 people. The AfD leader at the time stated officially the AfD want nothing to do with Pegida...this isn't referenced in your Reuters link, but is obviously a key bit of info. I agree Pegida were more hardline...they're history now, as they were insignificant and unvoteable to begin with.
Remember your bold statement:
the far right / neo-nazis have a foothold.
They do not. They are blown out of all proportion by an
establishment terrified at the popularity of a rightwing anti-establishment party, at the possibility of them getting power and changing certain
established policies. The reason for this hype is to deter swing voters from voting AfD (as which reasonable person wants to vote for a neo-nazi party?).
It's working in the West...but not in the East. Why is that? Not because the Easteners are bad racists, but because they're wise to narrative-propaganda due to their DDR experience.
Why aren't AfD in power regionally? Because despite having the most votes, the other parties made a coalition against them.
A
crazy thing happened a while back which no one wants to talk about: Merkel personally cancelled the winner of a regional electoral vote because the winner was an anti-establishment FDP candidate. She ordered it redone...then the establishment Merkel-approved Left candidate won. Why did she do this? Because the AfD supported the FDP candidate. How come she was able to order this at all?
Good question...which didn't interest many in the media.
Who are the fascists, and who is the Resistance?
The media & political establishment shape the narrative.
Further: the two events you referenced are from 2017 & 2018. Got any more?