CahillsCornerFlag
Player Valuation: £70m
it's a fkn ace read, been discussed a few times in here, a real fave of mine, you should try no country for old men too
Having finished it, got a few points to share.
I love the ideas the book hints at (or what I got from it anyway) but I didn't care for how it was written. It seems excessively wordy and I often found it difficult to ascertain what was happening/where the characters were, which is odd as I'm a big reader and haven't been made to feel that way by a book before.
I think re reading it would make certain themes stand out more and I'd get more from the book, but then I don't think I'll ever be bothered to wade through 250 word sentences again.
The ending was ambiguous but it seemed as though the judge's evil nature had been impacting more on the kid than we were originally led to believe. Like the judge was trying to coax the kid to commit unspeakable acts troughout (that were only hinted at) and at the end the whole 'he can never die thing' because he knows his evil will live on through the kid.
Or maybe not. Proper ambiguous book. I'm almost annoyed at myself for not liking it more, I feel I might've missed the point slightly as it certainly sounds like the kind of book of love, but his prose just didn't click with me.