yes, I agree. the health consequences for some drugs are terrible. And part of the whole ethos of sport is one of engaging in an activity that is healthy and encourages active lifestyle. Only the culture of most sport now, is one of being (and I am the worst hypocrite here) sat in an armchair, beer can open,beer belly bulging out from curry stained vest, shouting at a professional athelete because he is no good.
Unfortunately this culture of winner takes all is really one of the biggest problems. the media and the fans don't help. The money goes relentlessly in that direction also. Taking part graciously doesn't matter a damn. sstyle or sportsmanship. Its who won, how many medals did we get, how many trophies? Nor, does it encourage others to lead active lifestyles, take up sport, learn to develop comradeship, teamwork, a sense of fair play etc.
none of those things are rewarded. Of course fans are a part of this culture and I said myself, I just care who is the fastest. That's the problem in most athletics. Its one against one, hard to encourage anything other than a winner takes all mentality.
amphetamines are regularly given to fighter pilots, with similarly negative consequences - psychosis being a fairly regular side effect of the drug, not a mental state you want in someone so lavishly equipped to realise destruction.
Prove that.
A SEAL platoon recently (last 2 years) got in trouble for taking drugs to improve reactions in combat situations. Guess what, DRUGS ARE NOT TOLERATED IN ANY SHAPE OR FORM in the US Military. People under the influence kill people. The Navy operates a ZERO tolerance program, and being part of that program I know the stats.
Pilots are tested just as much as the liberty risk seaman is.
Oh, and the aforementioned SEALs, not in the Navy anymore, dishonorable discharges for them.