• Participation within this subforum is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

Today's football.

Status
Not open for further replies.

England should go 3 at the back Stones, Jags and Cahill - The absence of a decent RB will be the achilles heel in a back 4

this wouldn't be the worst idea. you could have milner and baines as wing backs.

think this would be a really good idea actually, if it weren't for the fact that it means they would have to play an extra centre mid - a position england are glaringly weak at and without any wingers when i think AOC is england's best player atm.

unless they play one man up front and play a flat midfield 4, but that means one of rooney or sturridge - roy wouldn't have the balls. i reckon it would work for england. they'll get ripped by any decent team with a marauding right back in johnson making it a 3 man defence and then the very old gerrard "protecting" the defence.
 
wilshere_1604288a.jpg
 


this wouldn't be the worst idea. you could have milner and baines as wing backs.

think this would be a really good idea actually, if it weren't for the fact that it means they would have to play an extra centre mid - a position england are glaringly weak at and without any wingers when i think AOC is england's best player atm.

unless they play one man up front and play a flat midfield 4, but that means one of rooney or sturridge - roy wouldn't have the balls. i reckon it would work for england. they'll get ripped by any decent team with a marauding right back in johnson making it a 3 man defence and then the very old gerrard "protecting" the defence.


The main problem as you identified is that you have to shoehorn Gerrard into the side regardless of formation
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top