stretford blue
Player Valuation: £35m
That goustos challenge was a straight red var looked at it and moved on totally ridiculous
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Toffeelover
Player Valuation: £80m
Perhaps our players should practice diving.
Terrarian
Player Valuation: £50m
I knew I had seen it somewhere
Problem is, we do this and are successful they will bring a retrospective punishment in again. Stop us doing it pretty quickly…
Blue83
Player Valuation: £25m
When you think Dom got a straight red for a softer tackle where he won the ball, yet more inconsistencies depending on which club is fouling
TraffordBlue
Player Valuation: £500k
The decision for that Gusto challenge was an absolute disgrace. If Gusto had made that challenge playing for Forest, Wolves or Everton, VAR would have stepped in and ordered the red.
Inconsistent decisions are made based on the teams involved. If that had been Fulham on Chelsea they also would have got a red and if it hadn't been given, the media would have been talking about the incident in to next week, but as it is, the MOTD panel unanimously agreed that it was right to brush it under the carpet and say that no red was fair.
The Premier League is dead as a competition.
Inconsistent decisions are made based on the teams involved. If that had been Fulham on Chelsea they also would have got a red and if it hadn't been given, the media would have been talking about the incident in to next week, but as it is, the MOTD panel unanimously agreed that it was right to brush it under the carpet and say that no red was fair.
The Premier League is dead as a competition.
You know what we need? Refs from Mars, Aliens that have no idea who the big team is.
Mars? The red planet? Wonder who they’d favour?
Bwana
Player Valuation: £8m
"What VVD is doing there is just a natural collision of two neutron stars, no malice intended therefore no need to check it. Compared DCL's outrageous attempt of severing Clyne's leg in a totally different match it's safe to say it should be three penalties to Liverpool."
bcblue1878
Player Valuation: £50m
Cannot believe that VAR decision on the first half took over 3 minutes to sort out! There were clearly two them offside even with Danjuma sat on his backside!
Didn’t need lines drawing, numerous replays or slow mos to sort that out!
Didn’t need lines drawing, numerous replays or slow mos to sort that out!
GoldenToffee
Player Valuation: £60m
Still shirt pulling allowed in the box I see, but penalties for Liverpool given for blatant diving.
Shame it's not a level playing field.
Shame it's not a level playing field.
Alanbileysfeathercut
Player Valuation: £80m
Not a fan,but Warnock on ref watch quoted Gallaghers words to Gallagher and said why have VAR then...
and it should have been a foul on danjuma, had he not been pulled into his arris, he would have cleared the lines and Bailey would have been even. more obviously offside
wandyr79
Player Valuation: £25m
I agreed with Jamie Redknapp, this is what VAR has brought us. Agreement with that numpty.
Joking aside, if we were to put up the 5 most ridiculous VAR moments, that would be up there. Maybe getting the right decision in the end would negate that but they had a natural line drawn for them. In the first picture, you had Danjuma sat (more or less) bolt upright on the mowed pitch line, you had the VIlla player stood a foot past this line. Bang, decision made. Add to the fact that it was also a foul and without the foul 100% chance of it being even more obviously offside. 10 seconds, decision made because of TWO clear and obvious reasons.
The fact that they started to look at the guy in front of the keeper when the shot was taken blew my mind. Unbelievable that they would even consider looking at the next phase of play and then go back and give the offside for the first one. The cynic in me would say that they were buying time while looking at the first one, trying their best to come up with a reason to give the goal but in the end decided that it was just too obvious, on this occasion.
Joking aside, if we were to put up the 5 most ridiculous VAR moments, that would be up there. Maybe getting the right decision in the end would negate that but they had a natural line drawn for them. In the first picture, you had Danjuma sat (more or less) bolt upright on the mowed pitch line, you had the VIlla player stood a foot past this line. Bang, decision made. Add to the fact that it was also a foul and without the foul 100% chance of it being even more obviously offside. 10 seconds, decision made because of TWO clear and obvious reasons.
The fact that they started to look at the guy in front of the keeper when the shot was taken blew my mind. Unbelievable that they would even consider looking at the next phase of play and then go back and give the offside for the first one. The cynic in me would say that they were buying time while looking at the first one, trying their best to come up with a reason to give the goal but in the end decided that it was just too obvious, on this occasion.