Simon Buttle
Player Valuation: £60m
Big verdict tomorrow at lunch time, what do we reckon then folks?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wagatha Christie (Rooney V Vardy)
- Thread starter BullensRoad
- Start date
- Status
They fight it out naked in the big jelly tank
magicjuan
Player Valuation: £60m
That's got Amazon Prime all over it...
Rooney I think comes out of it better.
Which is a little like saying they both fell in mud, but one got a little less muddy.
It should have never gone to trial
Diogenes the Cynic
Player Valuation: £40m
It's hard to judge someone without knowing them personally and having all the information.
Hard but not impossible, that Rebekah Vardy seems like an awful person.
Take her to the cleaners Colleen.
Hard but not impossible, that Rebekah Vardy seems like an awful person.
Take her to the cleaners Colleen.
GoldenToffee
Player Valuation: £70m
Coleen wins.
ROONEY, ROONEY, ROONEY
So no jelly tank then? so much for British Justice.
BullensRoad
Player Valuation: £30m
Haha leg it Vardy ya midnight
Her whole life has been a fame hungry goon.
Her whole life has been a fame hungry goon.
In her ruling, Mrs Justice Steyn said it was "likely" that Rebekah Vardy's then-agent, Caroline Watt, "undertook the direct act" of passing the information to tabloid newspaper The Sun.
"Nonetheless, the evidence... clearly shows, in my view, that Mrs Vardy knew of and condoned this behaviour, actively engaging in it by directing Ms Watt to the private Instagram account, sending her screenshots of Mrs Rooney's posts, drawing attention to items of potential interest to the press, and answering additional queries raised by the press via Ms Watt," she added.
Mrs Justice Steyn continued: "In my judgment, the conclusions that I have reached as to the extent to which the claimant engaged in disclosing to the Sun information to which she only had access as a permitted follower of an Instagram account which she knew, and Mrs Rooney repeatedly asserted, was private, suffice to show the single meaning is substantially true."
"Nonetheless, the evidence... clearly shows, in my view, that Mrs Vardy knew of and condoned this behaviour, actively engaging in it by directing Ms Watt to the private Instagram account, sending her screenshots of Mrs Rooney's posts, drawing attention to items of potential interest to the press, and answering additional queries raised by the press via Ms Watt," she added.
Mrs Justice Steyn continued: "In my judgment, the conclusions that I have reached as to the extent to which the claimant engaged in disclosing to the Sun information to which she only had access as a permitted follower of an Instagram account which she knew, and Mrs Rooney repeatedly asserted, was private, suffice to show the single meaning is substantially true."
75 pages ffs.
How much will Jamie Vardy be in the bag for?
(I still think double or nothing in the jelly tank is in the decision that best serves justice and the public interest)
Para 39-41 are terrific and para 70 is just beautiful
@degsy I'll read it and pick out the good bits
- Status