Genuinely, couldn't care less what gender a pundit or a member of the comms team is.
So long as they're knowledgeable, are economic with words and share only things of genuine interest (ie - a subtle tactical switch the layperson may not pick up on right away) then they'll do for me.
Unfortunately, this disqualifies about 90% of those with cock and balls and probably 75% without. The men definitely talk more guff per head, but the broadcasters are trying to rush through diversity, gender and inclusion staffing measures.
Personally, If they broadcast the game without comms I'd be happy.
So long as they're knowledgeable, are economic with words and share only things of genuine interest (ie - a subtle tactical switch the layperson may not pick up on right away) then they'll do for me.
Unfortunately, this disqualifies about 90% of those with cock and balls and probably 75% without. The men definitely talk more guff per head, but the broadcasters are trying to rush through diversity, gender and inclusion staffing measures.
Personally, If they broadcast the game without comms I'd be happy.