52% of our goals came from set pieces last season so this could actually be the tactic.
Might be a challenge for Jimmy Neston now that Onana is away
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
52% of our goals came from set pieces last season so this could actually be the tactic.
No. Absolutely not.Well on the books it will show as £50m incoming, so if we’re talking strictly about PSR then that would mean we could spend £50m on a replacement and be even.
ZAll gone very quiet.
Are we now on Plan E?
No. Absolutely not.
I am not going to rehash all the accounting nerd stuff again but what matters for PSR is profit vs book value after sales costs (agents fee, professional fees, PL levy, player pay-off if needed, sell-on fee to Lille etc.) and the wages saved.
Similarly what counts for PSR when we buy a player is the fee and on-costs amortised (spread) over contract length (max 5 years) and the wages.
It is definitely not £50m in = £50m out.
Think they will be, can’t remember the precise number but they owe an absolute fortune in future transfer instalments, and that’s going to be a problem on Championship income with parachute payments decreasing.Are Leeds still under pressure to sell, by the way? I'm not up-to-date on their financial situation. They've just sold Archie Gray for a wedge.
Are Leeds still under pressure to sell, by the way? I'm not up-to-date on their financial situation. They've just sold Archie Gray for a wedge.
No. Absolutely not.
I am not going to rehash all the accounting nerd stuff again but what matters for PSR is profit vs book value after sales costs (agents fee, professional fees, PL levy, player pay-off if needed, sell-on fee to Lille etc.) and the wages saved.
Similarly what counts for PSR when we buy a player is the fee and on-costs amortised (spread) over contract length (max 5 years) and the wages.
It is definitely not £50m in = £50m out
Think they will be, can’t remember the precise number but they owe an absolute fortune in future transfer instalments, and that’s going to be a problem on Championship income with parachute payments decreasing.
That is as bad a set of figures I think I've ever seen regarding transfers.
They look in all sorts of trouble.
So £25m plus Zat? How do I get to Kev to accept it immediately??
Not very good options for themIt`s like books of the Leeds that got to the Champions League semi and then got relegated and stayed down for 17 yrs.
You`d have think they`d have learnt their lesson, but apparently not.
Matty, I don’t want to drag us down an accounting rabbit hole but say we make £30m selling Onana (PSR profit and wages saved) we could potentially turn that into eg 2 players covering the first year slice of their fee and wages with some to spare (remember we also have to cover the operating losses we continue to make). If we do reinvest we then have to keep selling players next year/growing revenue to cover the future costs we incur on those deals . Cash Flow is king over the medium term but in the short-term selling Onana gives us options. How we choose to use them remains to be seen.so we can only spend a bit?
we should be able to spend what we make