davek
Player Valuation: £150m
Brilliant.Not sure but this might illustrate your point?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Brilliant.Not sure but this might illustrate your point?
Sure, the US just labored to a 1-0 win over Iran, but don’t worry, Charles Barkley thinks we’ve got something for all those teams. Although, “that boy Muhbappe…he ain’t no joke.”I wouldn't look past France, Spain or Brazil.
There's nothing here outside those three. Just a load of sound and fury.
Yup, been saying it for months. The winner - and probably both finalists - comes from that trio. The standard of this tournament is abysmal. I understand and accept that international football will no longer match up to the standard set in the Champions League by multinational sides. But the format of this tournament is all wrong. We'd be far better with a World Cup of 16 teams playing in four groups of four. Basically, the Mexico 1970 format. Or a tweaked Argentina 1978 format with two semi-finals after a second group stage. But that's gone with the last century...I wouldn't look past France, Spain or Brazil.
There's nothing here outside those three. Just a load of sound and fury.
Yup, been saying it for months. The winner - and probably both finalists - comes from that trio. The standard of this tournament is abysmal. I understand and accept that international football will no longer match up to the standard set in the Champions League by multinational sides. But the format of this tournament is all wrong. We'd be far better with a World Cup of 16 teams playing in four groups of four. Basically, the Mexico 1970 format. Or a tweaked Argentina 1978 format with two semi-finals after a second group stage. But that's gone with the last century...
I, for one, think a 48-team tournament is ludicrous, but given that there will be more knockout games in that format as a percentage of total matches, I don't think the 2026 format is all that bad given the low standard of the international game, in general. Two group games are enough. On to the jeopardy of knockout!
Think they would play winner of France or poland on the 10thIf England win on Sunday anyone who who they might play next and when?
I tend to agree with you. I've long since given up on the notion that the World Cup is a tournament that is designed to crown the best side as champions. That hasn't been the case, arguably, since 1978. Then you had three group games, and then three more against top eight sides. You then got to the final. Now, it's becoming more of a lottery. But with two out of three teams making it out of the groups - apparently - in 2026, there is little jeopardy for the top sides and then we're into knockout. So, it's really a cup competition now and chance plays a bigger role than it would in the quasi leagues of the 1970s. But no minnow is going to win five knockout games to win the World Cup, so in the end the usual suspects will take the glory.If you ignore the standard of the group games, a 48 team tournament does give a much better chance for lesser teams who usually just miss out in the qualifiers, to play in the tournament. Which will be amazing for their fans.
I do like seeing the fans from nations where you wouldn’t normally watch their football, how they embrace it and how they celebrate when they cause an upset. That’s brought some of the best moments of this and recent World Cups.
Even having a 16 team tournament, the 3 teams you’ve mentioned would all probably win it, it’ll just take a bit longer to get there.
Sure, the US just labored to a 1-0 win over Iran, but don’t worry, Charles Barkley thinks we’ve got something for all those teams. Although, “that boy Muhbappe…he ain’t no joke.”
As if an American has just accused Europeans are being smug and arrogant.This USA team is our best roster. We have players playing regularly at the top European clubs.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with being patriotic and hoping we win our games. Most European nations are very smug and arrogant and I'm sure the Dutch are feeling very confident in beating us too.
Sure, the US just labored to a 1-0 win over Iran, but don’t worry, Charles Barkley thinks we’ve got something for all those teams. Although, “that boy Muhbappe…he ain’t no joke.”
I would agree that a 48-team tournament is ridiculous and will be very difficult to manage. That's just a complete sop to commercial interests and goes way overboard. How long will the next tournament take to complete, 6 weeks?Yup, been saying it for months. The winner - and probably both finalists - comes from that trio. The standard of this tournament is abysmal. I understand and accept that international football will no longer match up to the standard set in the Champions League by multinational sides. But the format of this tournament is all wrong. We'd be far better with a World Cup of 16 teams playing in four groups of four. Basically, the Mexico 1970 format. Or a tweaked Argentina 1978 format with two semi-finals after a second group stage. But that's gone with the last century...
I, for one, think a 48-team tournament is ludicrous, but given that there will be more knockout games in that format as a percentage of total matches, I don't think the 2026 format is all that bad given the low standard of the international game, in general. Two group games are enough. On to the jeopardy of knockout!