he was a bit mental when it came to crime mate shouldnt be to hard, he saw crime as a normality and usefull way of releaseing social tenions form what i remember. It would be a good crituqe to look at the social implications of soceity, removing responibility form the indicidual etc and the context he was wirting in Marx, Captialism, anarchy etc. He had some definitive ideas on law and punishment and some intresting if not out dated ideas on suuicide would be intresting comparing and critiuqeing them, but might be more work. Intresting point is it the indvidual crimianl chooses to break the law through choice, genetics, instincts or is it society who makes the Crimanl through poverty, circumstances, expeirenceid integrate that into his theroy.
Sorry that prob no help at all.