Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

2015 post UK election discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
daylightrobber said:
Way to dodge the question. Please answer what you would do.
Click to expand...

2, 3, No No.

1. is arguable. If you have two candidates equally qualified, I think there is an argument that the job should go to the person that's lived here their whole life.

Whistlin' Dixie said:
But you don't know how many of them there are - do you? You don't know how much they cost compared to other things, do you?

And you said tax AVOIDERS before........

So what have you to say about IDS being an even worse scrounger?
Click to expand...

>Implying I voted conservative
 
SNova said:
2, 3, No No.

1. is arguable. If you have two candidates equally qualified, I think there is an argument that the job should go to the person that's lived here their whole life.



>Implying I voted conservative
Click to expand...

Oh so it was UKIP then?

That's where you get your SCROUNGERS dogma from is it??

http://politicalscrapbook.net/2014/...mants-are-parasitic-underclass-of-scroungers/

Accused of “pointing at immigrants and the disabled and holding his nose”on Question Time last night, Farage retorted that he “never has” criticised people with disabilities.

Yeah, Nige. Apart from in that manifesto policy document which was mysteriouslydeleted from the UKIP website last year.

The party claimed that 75% of incapacity benefit claimants “are fit and healthy”, dubbing them “a parasitic underclass of scroungers” and handing them a £1,300 cut in state aid:

“The welfare state has also created a brazen culture of benefit “scrounging”, whereby individuals who are perfectly capable of working refuse to do so, and go on benefits instead. They frequently justify this by feigning illness.

“This gives rise to a parasitic underclass of “scroungers”, which represents both an unreasonable tax burden on the working population

What a guy, eh? :cool:
 
Last edited:

Vote Conservative

22-savilethatcher-gt.jpg
 
It makes me laugh, Sturgeon on the news going on about having a strong representation in Westminster now.

It doesn't mean jack love and you know it, you have no power whatsoever, you were getting all the devolution promises anyway, you had all the power you were getting, you've actually screwed the Scottish public by giving them 5/10 more years of the Tories.

The Jocks need to wise up bigtime.
 
The Mighty Quint said:
It makes me laugh, Sturgeon on the news going on about having a strong representation in Westminster now.

It doesn't mean jack love and you know it, you have no power whatsoever, you were getting all the devolution promises anyway, you had all the power you were getting, you've actually screwed the Scottish public by giving them 5/10 more years of the Tories.

The Jocks need to wise up bigtime.
Click to expand...

Every single scotland seat could have been won by labour and the tories would still have a majority. How is it the snp's fault?
 

Allezfan said:
Incidentally this thread makes me think labour are going to lose again in 5 years time.

You got your arses kicked. You need to work out why people don't want what you're selling and rebrand. You go again without rethinking where you went wrong and without respecting those who didn't vote for you and you'll lose again.
Click to expand...

And next time it might be by Boris. Goodness, the scenes.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Register
Back
Top