2023/2024 Kits Thread

[Christophe1]

Nike, adidas and even under armour or castore provide modern kits which people want to wear and buy.

When we got our first Nike kit about ten years ago people where lining up outside the store on the release day.

Hummel have the worst designers and marketing and it's showing evidently.

Absurd opinion. Obviously someone who just wants to wear a swoosh. Nike templates are absolutely hideous year after year. Castore kits fall apart in the wash. The UA Southampton kits were absolutely horrific design wise. I might allow you Adidas!

 

[chrismpw]

Nike, adidas and even under armour or castore provide modern kits which people want to wear and buy.

When we got our first Nike kit about ten years ago people where lining up outside the store on the release day.

Hummel have the worst designers and marketing and it's showing evidently.

Disagree. Nike have 1 designer a photocopier, 10 million ad-men and a big bucket to collect cash from their programmed fanboys.

Hummel have been great ... but tried too hard here.

 

[maccavennie]

Gives it a cleaner, less busy look from the front.

All I ask Papa, is for it to be Chevroned up to the max like a pair of 4 stripe trainers

 

[brieverton]

It's nice enough. The best from Hummel to date.

Always welcome a collar on kits. Otherwise they just look like training tops to me.

Reminds me of the 91/92 kit.

 

[chrismpw]

I think the kids kits should all have EITC logo on it and not just be blank. It would be nice to have the option.

I'd pay an extra £20 for a shirt with NO advertising on it. If I liked the shirt that is.

I think advertising gambling is abhorrent and WE should be paid to have them. I'd still refuse though.

 

[Lob]

65 nicker for a short sleeved shirt. Almost as dear as a pie.

 

[Dougie]

This is a great shout!

I have 15 month old boy. I got the him the kit last year and I will buy him this years kit. For me just looks plain when it’s blank but I know others prefer it. But I remember when Everton had the EITC sponsor on the shirts for one prem game and it looks okay. Think would look decent on this kit. As I said when purchasing the kit you should have the option to have it blank or the EITC logo on it for all kids and infant kits.

 

[kenada_blue]

Nike, adidas and even under armour or castore provide modern kits which people want to wear and buy.

When we got our first Nike kit about ten years ago people where lining up outside the store on the release day.

Hummel have the worst designers and marketing and it's showing evidently.

Castore. Lol

 

[BullensRoad]

Disagree. Nike have 1 designer a photocopier, 10 million ad-men and a big bucket to collect cash from their programmed fanboys.

Hummel have been great ... but tried too hard here.

Pretty sure Nike has the biggest marketing budget in the world, people buy their kits when they don't even support the teams they make them for.

 

[T LEAFE]

Silly horrible collar

 

[Davideeyore]

There we are.

 

[BullensRoad]

Absurd opinion. Obviously someone who just wants to wear a swoosh. Nike templates are absolutely hideous year after year. Castore kits fall apart in the wash. The UA Southampton kits were absolutely horrific design wise. I might allow you Adidas!

I want to wear a swoosh?

There's a reason those companies provide kits to the biggest clubs, if people on this forum had their way we'd be wearing kits from the 70's.

I don't know one person who goes to buy Hummel gear.

 

[BullensRoad]

Castore. Lol

Better than Hummel

 

[Wizard]

Better than Hummel

Castore's Quality Problems Continue in 2023

Nelson Semedo of Wolverhampton Wanderers wore a kit with an upside down Wolves logo.

www.google.com

 

[Noble Savage]

It's okay. I didn't buy last year's and I may skip this one too.
I like the collar but it's just blah.