It's always going to create a split this but some of the responses on Twitter to the most recent post by the 27 campaign really do shock me.
"New stadium, new DOF and Sharpy on the board - that means they're listening surely"
"Moshiri said judge him at the of the window - you don't become a billionaire by being an idiot"
"Bad timing, it feels like an agenda against Bill and DBB"
"This will affect player recruitment"
"Demoralising the team and creating a toxic working environment"
"Did we not learn from last season when getting behind the team made them play better"
Everyone is entitled to their opinion but how bad does it need to get before people demand change? Most of us work for businesses that, if governed as badly as Everton, would take appropriate actions. That would usually mean a change in leadership, hierarchy, or direction. Some of the actual facts to support the 27 campaign are just as shocking as some of the fans complicity in our demise. The salaries, the turnover of staff, the lack of experience and appropriate skill sets and, ultimately, the fact Bill Kenwright still has anything to do with our football club.
How much decline will it take? How far behind do we really need to get before some fans realise, we are one of the worst managed football clubs in the world? How do some people not realise that supporting the team but disliking the running of the club can be treated separately?
Some may not agree with the 27 campaign but they are a group of fans who love the club who want us to be better. How can some of the fan base possibly find so many inaccurate ways of depicting the message? How can so many fans be happy with the current governance of our club that plays such a big role in each of our lives? Not only do some fans not support it, they become aggressive about the fact it even exists. Like defending everything about the club is a priority over being impartial about the different facets that make the club.
NSNO