#27 Years/NSNOW/#AllTogetherNow Fan Campaign

[matty1878]

Take it easy jazz

cryin lol

 

[DanEFC92]

I actually can't believe this. I'm just finding out from reading your comments. Did some lad from the FAB back the board in an interview with Sky?

 

[ToffeeTim]

Everyone has their own opinion and that's sound - but what's got fans backs up is this...

100%

He wasnt interviewed on an individual capacity. He was interviewed as chairman of the FAB.

 

[Roger Milla]

Apologies if posted already but any link to this dross that jizz has been saying

 

[DanEFC92]

Jazz there.

 

[mahermi1]

Yeah, so Moshiri should of walked away, by not doing so he showed how dumb he is.

You won't have a bad word said against your hero will you. Bill sold to Moshiri for a massive profit you can't deny that, so it's Bill's fault he's here correct.. Do you think Bill's arsed ? No neither do i.

 

[davek]

Jazzgate.

 

[ToffeeTim]

People who support and defend the board need to start giving reasons why they back them. Those supporting or organising protests are always asked to justify their positions. Why can't those on the other side of the argument do the same?

 

[GrandOldSte117]

I've saw comment from fans saying they were on the fence until that interview...

That is truly unbelievable stuff there. 'Here we are at Bramley Moore Dock the best stadium that there will ever be in the league built by the wonderful Farhad Moshiri'

 

[AndyC]

Wonder what Alan Irwin thinks ?

He was the interviewer but, Alan Myers probably oversaw it

 

[Toff33Blues99]

People who support and defend the board need to start giving reasons why they back them. Those supporting or organising protests are always asked to justify their positions. Why can't those on the other side of the argument do the same?

It's the prosecution responsibility to prove guilt not the other way round

 

[GrandOldSte117]

People who support and defend the board need to start giving reasons why they back them. Those supporting or organising protests are always asked to justify their positions. Why can't those on the other side of the argument do the same?

They will say something about negativity not being needed, back them blah blah

 

[maccavennie]

Without even meaning it, today's protest (that some reckon was crap and didn't serve a purpose) has already given a platform to the new FAB and shown they're in the pockets of Everton.

Jazz is the chairman of that board and he made an absolute show of himself and the so called FAB board today. The "I'm content with the board" was a disgrace from any Evertonian to say at this point and the crossroads where we are.

No good Hannah saying that's his opinion and nit of everyone's of the board when he's supposed to be the one voicing the opinion of the board and showing some form of structure.

So for anyone moaning that today wasn't good enough because only 200/300 fans turned up in the piss down rain, I'd say they've gained a bit of attention and traction.

 

[AndyC]

They did.

And any opinion offered ?

 

[ToffeeTim]

It's the prosecution responsibility to prove guilt not the other way round

This isn't a legal case. Its a debate about the future of a football club.

Why can't they provide reasons why they are so upset at people criticising the hierarchy of the club? I think some people are just so used to defending them that it's almost robotic st this point. They don't even know why they do it.