Highlander hasn’t aged well!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
6 + 2 Point Deductions
- Thread starter GrandOldTeam
- Start date
No one else in the league had a worse wages to turnover ratio than us during that period as well.
Iana
Player Valuation: £1.5m
I don’t think it was that much but for 21/22 season which we have been deducted 10 points we would only be able to claim maximum 4 months(the war started in Feb 22) of the sponsorship money as a mitigation for that period. We still need another mitigation to be accepted to be compliant for the 3 year period ending 21/22….player X perhaps?
It becomes a much bigger factor in the 22/23 calculations because that would be a full year of lost sponsorship.
Titus Bramble
Best centre half to grace the Premier League
Anything other than all 10 points back implies a second points deduction for our 2nd charge
I think we will have to wait for the decision - which may be good news , but they may get us 2nd time round with that other charge .....
I had a dream I was being tag-teamed by Gemma Atkinson and Holly Willoughby. I wouldn't put much faith into dreams mate.
Not necessarily I think. It depends on how far over they have us for the second charge
If they accept some of the mitigation in the appeal, then that mitigation could potentially make us compliant, or close to being compliant for the second period.
I don't know the figures so I have no idea if this is likely, but it could be a potential scenario if we are over by less second time around.
All that said, if they don't reduce our penalty this time around, I would fully expect another severe penalty second time round.
Tony’s Carp
Player Valuation: £50m
I think it’s really hard to justify more than 6. Their argument for a sporting sanction came from precedent cited from the EFL v Sheff Wed case that sporting advantage would be inferred etc.
That case ended with Wednesday getting 6, and they were proportionately far more over their limit than we are. That’s not binding on them but if they are using it as precedent for giving a sporting sanction at all they should surely have regard to what the sanction actually was in that case.
Tony’s Carp
Player Valuation: £50m
Translate that into Latin and we’ve got ourselves a new club motto.
Yarrgh
Player Valuation: £70m
Pick one and make do. Real life is tough like that.
I believe that he is.
I do believe that he gets information from the club and because he works for SKY he will get more than most, but he discloses what he is allowed to disclose at any time.
Can I split it and have only 5 points back and 3 minutes with just Gemma?
35 minutes until a Times/Telegraph leak…
ForeverEverton
Player Valuation: £50m
There is the assumption that the 22/23 books are in breach as well, I`ve heard we couldn`t account exactly for the latest period due to the ongoing appeal so left the final amount asterisked and likely to change.
Obviously the PL have taken exception to this.... With a loss of c£40m in 21/22 and I`d expect similar or less in the 22/23 period whch is yet to be released. I don`t think we have breached again.
The reason I say that is because in the 22/23 calculation the year 18/19 drops off which was a £111m loss, I believe the majority of that would have been down to wages and/or player trading.
To illustrates this....
2022 alleged breach
18/19 -£111.8m
19/20 -£139.8m Averaged due to COVID
20/21 -£120.9m Averaged due to COVID
21/22 -£44.7m
2023 Calc
19/20 -£139.8m Averaged due to COVID
20/21 -£120.9m Averaged due to COVID
21/22 -£44.7m
22/23 ??? Due to be released but I imagine it will be inline or less than the previous season due to the cutting of squad, transfers out and cutting wages.
The problem is he just does it after all of the other journalists have told us first.