hallamblue
Player Valuation: £40m
No that won't be heard this season, and is very hard to prove anywaymy heads fell off so we can stay up but still go down if the other charge kicks in now?
No that won't be heard this season, and is very hard to prove anywaymy heads fell off so we can stay up but still go down if the other charge kicks in now?
Good to see you back Dave xPED unbelievably weak on 5Live there. Practically praising the PL for finally dealing with it all.
The PSR calculation starts with the losses from the audited accounts and allows deductions such as youth academy etc. It should not be increasing the losses by adding back interest that has clearly increased because of the capital cost of building the stadium.
Highly unlikely
That's not like you at allmy heads fell off so we can stay up but still go down if the other charge kicks in now?
We should be drowning the PL in litigation as City probably will do. Absolutely amazing that we have a billionaire owner who can’t even afford decent accountants or lawyers. The defamation of the Everton brand by the PL has been enormous, never mind the impact on the integrity of the league with these points deductions. Should have sued them the second that first charge landed.
HE IS RISENPED unbelievably weak on 5Live there. Practically praising the PL for finally dealing with it all.
I think Masters has gone off on one mate. He wanted a total of 17 points off us. He’s lost the plot.
PED unbelievably weak on 5Live there. Practically praising the PL for finally dealing with it all.
Exactly, the auditors agree with the club that it relates to the stadium. That should be the end of the argument for the commission.If its capitalised in the audited accounts then surely we know the answer to that question?
I don’t see why not Danny.Can football clubs, sue the Premier League? Heard conflicting things.
Would suspect some shenanigans from Forest or Everton if either go down.
Hello Dave, welcome back mate.Yes, thanks lads. All ok here.
Seems to be never-ending.
The Merseyside club could yet face a further points deduction in relation to interest costs associated with the building of the club's new stadium at Bramley-Moore Dock, though that issue is unlikely to be resolved before the end of the season.
In its written reasons the independent commission said the Premier League had asked for a five-point deduction for the club.
The commission decided that any breach of PSR justifies a three-point deduction, with an additional two points because Everton's breach of £16.6m - 15.8% above the £105m threshold - is deemed significant.
However, the commission accepted Everton's arguments for mitigation in relation to the fact the club has:
- Already been deducted points this season
- Suffered a loss of revenue because of the suspension of a sponsorship deal with Russian company USM
- Made an early admission of guilt