Difference being Everton have plead guilty and other teams haven't (yet)No clue how they can justify any deduction with the rules other teams have been breaking.
City should be playing in the Sunday League if these are the penalties.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Difference being Everton have plead guilty and other teams haven't (yet)No clue how they can justify any deduction with the rules other teams have been breaking.
City should be playing in the Sunday League if these are the penalties.
looking more and more like that was the wrong choice after allDifference being Everton have plead guilty and other teams haven't (yet)
looking more and more like that was the wrong choice after all
Then the IC is contradicting themselves.I see “PL sources” have supposedly disputed Burnham’s letter where he makes the point about changing penalty mechanism in the middle of the process. Now saying the commission asked for their suggestion in August, and also asked the same of Everton, who suggested fine or transfer ban, which is as per the report.
First time they have defended themselves? They will feel they don’t have to defend the 10 points as they didn’t give us the penalty.
More pressure needed. Hopefully them allegedly breaking silence is a sign the criticism is hitting home.
He's getting a Christmas card.
Like any commission they can ask what the prosecution and defence feel is just punishment before coming to a supposed impartial decision.Then the IC is contradicting themselves.
The PL rule book/handbook says that the IC has wide ranging powers in relation to punishments and sanctions in relation to a breach of PSR guidelines.
Why would the IC ask what the PL thought if they had complete autonomy to set the punishment themselves and which they argued vehemently about in their final report.
Andy Burnham is right to point out the supposed “independence” of the commission and the prejudicial process undertaken.
I hope a whistleblower has supplied him with some evidence of PL internal comms and fear of an independent regulator leading to this wholly disproportionate punishment.
He’s won,I’d rather have seen him lose and cryarsing.He's getting a Christmas card.
Used to hate him but thats soundHe's getting a Christmas card.
Still a horrible little ratHe's getting a Christmas card.
It's bollocks.Then the IC is contradicting themselves.
The PL rule book/handbook says that the IC has wide ranging powers in relation to punishments and sanctions in relation to a breach of PSR guidelines.
Why would the IC ask what the PL thought if they had complete autonomy to set the punishment themselves and which they argued vehemently about in their final report.
Andy Burnham is right to point out the supposed “independence” of the commission and the prejudicial process undertaken.
I hope a whistleblower has supplied him with some evidence of PL internal comms and fear of an independent regulator leading to this wholly disproportionate punishment.
Just got in from the game, did the protests get any coverage at all?
Did the c'''nts get away with the cards being raised