6 + 2 Point Deductions

[Goat]

That’s too bad. Would’ve been fun to watch one of the 6 in a squirmy position…Also, why have they not been charged if they’ve already basically admitted it?

I must confess, I have no idea what is happening with Chelsea or what they are meant to have done.

I just know they have yet to be charged for anything.

 

[Marius57]

From the 17 Nov. so early Feb ? I thought I had read much later but so much misinformation out there

I can’t find anything confirming it but I swear I’ve read it somewhere.

Lots of reports say the decision would be early 2024 though,

 

[Marius57]

Are you broken or something?

There was nothing independent about the panel, your wummery is becoming tiresome.

As I’ve said on multiple occasions, a financial penalty for a financial breach would have got no complaints from me, and some blues (not me before you start, you bore!) may, just MAY, have taken a few points deduction on the chin and moved on. However, getting more points taken off than had we entered administration is just insane and totally corrupt and unfair - ie an injustice.

We don’t need to see what happens to other clubs, that has nothing to do with Everton - it’s already been disclosed that the rules they used against Everton won’t be in place for anyone else - are you that dense or blind by wanting city to be hammered, that you don’t get it!?!

Also, stop tagging me in other threads, you try hard wum.

One of the worst Wums on the site. I wouldn’t bother responding. Fairly certain they are a Celtic fan anyway based off some of their posting history etc.

 

[MikeH72]

One of the worst Wums on the site. I wouldn’t bother responding. Fairly certain they are a Celtic fan anyway based off some of their posting history etc.

Deffo the strangest poster on here.

 

[Charlie Sweet]

Nah, I’m out, won’t let you pollute the thread with your nonsense any further.

Enjoy your boxroom, sweet cheeks.

Mate if you don't know the answer just say

 

[Charlie Sweet]

One of the worst Wums on the site. I wouldn’t bother responding. Fairly certain they are a Celtic fan anyway based off some of their posting history etc.

Ha ha mate not quite. I was at the old girl for the mighty Reykjavík at home never mind in the middle of the 6,000 away at Forest on a dark winters night. All though the bad years and the even worse ones.

 

[NathDogg]

Mate if you don't know the answer just say

Answers are in the thread mate, I’m not doing your homework for you, potato waffles.

Suggest you go back and study it before posting anymore inane babblings.

 

[Charlie Sweet]

Answers are in the thread mate, I’m not doing your homework for you, potato waffles.

Suggest you go back and study it before posting anymore inane babblings.

They really are not. I've done my legal training thanks mush. This is pure groupthink.

 

[mahermi1]

How was the disciplinary panel not independent Nigel?

Do you actually agree with this 10 point deduction? If you do then that would be very strange, in fact I haven't heard of any Everton fan that does. Also most of the pundits, commentators are of the same thought, its drastically too high for the so called breach.

 

[Ruairi77]

How was the disciplinary panel not independent Nigel?

who appointed it?

 

[Jacko93]

Chelsea havent even been charged, so not a chance they get any points reduction any time soon.

Tbf, with what they're saying now, they can be charged in January and judged before seasons end.

 

[Goat]

Tbf, with what they're saying now, they can be charged in January and judged before seasons end.

Fair enough, havent really paid attention to it, for me, until they are charged, its just media claptrap.

Thats not to say they wont be charged.

 

[Moomin]

Do you actually agree with this 10 point deduction? If you do then that would be very strange, in fact I haven't heard of any Everton fan that does. Also most of the pundits, commentators are of the same thought, its drastically too high for the so called breach.

That's what we need to be fighting, the punishment that we have been given.

 

[Jacko93]

Fair enough, havent really paid attention to it, for me, until they are charged, its just media claptrap.

Thats not to say they wont be charged.

Exactly right. Can only deal with the here and now.

Not even any murmurings that Chelsea will fall foul beyond fag packet calcs by people who weren't in the room.

City are facing different charges to us, as Chelsea will be if they get charged. Both are more for fraudulent behavior with the intent to deceive, where as even the commission stated that although we broke the barrier, we never did it on purpose.

What that means for Chelsea and City? Nobody knows.

 

[Moomin]

who appointed it?

The Premier League.

It's too late in the day to complain about the commision now. We would have had a chance to question or raise concerns about members before it started.

The premier league is a boys club. The Lawyers that represented us and the premier league are in that boys club as well.