Under The Lights
ORDER NOW
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Net spend of £460m in the last 5 years? And that's not spending loads?You seem like to assume that spending loads of money is the only way to do this. Spurs are the model that shows it can be done
I'm pretty sure they've already said they are changing the rules. Didn't [Poor language removed] Masters say so during the CMS Committee meeting? Makes a total mockery of applying the rules this season.Watch the PL suddenly change the rules with so many at risk
The 3 year rolling system means we will be under the microscope for some time, hopefully the independent panel come to some sort of precedent that allows a club breathing space from further points deductions if they are trending the right direction if a club has already recieved a deduction. That's if the rules are here to promote sustainability and not produce punative action for other motives.How can we still be on that list considering how much we have curtailed our spending and sold our best players ?
The fact that half the league is one there tells its own story.
If we don’t get done and Leeds and Leicester do should we sue
BournemouthNett spend past 5 years
1. Chelsea - £672.8m
2. Manchester United - £600.2m
3. Arsenal - £551.2m
4. Tottenham Hotspur - £463m
5. Newcastle United - £416.2m
6. Aston Villa - £364.5m
7. Manchester City - £316.5m
8. AFC Bournemouth - £286.4m
9. West Ham United - £248.1m
10. Liverpool - £217.7m
11. Nottingham Forest - £208m
12. Fulham - £135.3m
13. Wolverhampton Wanderers - £125.9m
14. Sheffield United - £124.3m
15. Crystal Palace – £102.7m
16. Burnley - £78.6m
17. Brentford - £73.2m
18. Everton - £38.3m
19. Luton Town - £12.2m
20. Brighton & Hove Albion - £92.3m profit
Ok, should have said beyond their means….Net spend of £460m in the last 5 years? And that's not spending loads?
I was just about to mention them. Definitely underachievers with that much spending going on.Bournemouth
But why should clubs be restricted from spending beyond "their means" if it's within "their owners' means"?Ok, should have said beyond their means….
Fair point
This.But why should clubs be restricted from spending beyond "their means" if it's within "their owners' means"?
And Spurs, in reality, have spent heavily (but within their means) just to stand still.
Exactly... I've posted about an NBA style cap so won't type it out again, but in reality couldn't the PL say that clubs break even but the owners take on the loss themselves. Say a club brings in 150 million and spends 500 million then the 350 million is the owners loss and can't be saddled on the club. at least this way there could be some hope for fans that they might compete with an owner who might be happy to lose money now to make money in the future.But why should clubs be restricted from spending beyond "their means" if it's within "their owners' means"?
And Spurs, in reality, have spent heavily (but within their means) just to stand still.
Spurs have been well run by their owners (ENIC?.) for years. It’s no coincidence that they’ve stopped being a mid table side any more is it?But why should clubs be restricted from spending beyond "their means" if it's within "their owners' means"?
And Spurs, in reality, have spent heavily (but within their means) just to stand still.