Could any of you P&S boffins help me understand something which doesn't make sense to me.
If we do sell Branth and Onana as many believe we will, and let's say we get 150m (for arguments sake). Do we theoretically have to spend most, if not all of that in the same financial season to stay compliant in following years? For example if we sell them and wait until the next financial year to reinvest, 4 years later it'll look like we have spent 150m in season 1 (of 3), despite it all coming in the season before, becoming an endless cycle of selling our most promising.
If its true, we can't only be thinking of selling branth and onana, but also need to think of who we can get to replace them in the same season.