Yarrgh
Player Valuation: £70m
Looks like it from where I am sitting.
Tommy Chong
Player Valuation: £50m
So then based on this, Forest should get a further points deduction after their appeal?
Throw into the mix that Chelsea will escape any punishment on a convenient rule change incoming soon.
hasn’t it been a different one for eaxh?
stamullenblue
Player Valuation: £20m
imagine we beat the Red [Poor language removed] .. that would be grounds i’m sure for another points deduction
CahillsCornerFlag
Player Valuation: £70m
A farce which surprises nobody. The PL trying to hit us again re the stadium costs is totally laughable, they’re petty spiteful children with a grudge. They’ll probably manage to do it a day before they change the rules so that if we do stay up, we start on a minus next season. Absolute vendetta.
So far.
Yarrgh
Player Valuation: £70m
Moose never lies
Personally think Forest and Everton should seek legal advice together prrior to going into any appeal.
Make it known that are acting in conjunction to view all possible outcomes with further legal action, against the PL, a possibility.
Make this uncomfortable for the league as possible
Make it known that are acting in conjunction to view all possible outcomes with further legal action, against the PL, a possibility.
Make this uncomfortable for the league as possible
pfim
Player Valuation: £35m
Technically no, as Burnley would have been 3 points closer to us had they won.
But yes.
Tony’s Carp
Player Valuation: £40m
It won’t be.
What the heck is this about? What a farce...
==========================
Remarkably, the written reasons revealed that this was not the end of the case against Everton following a dispute between them and the Premier League about the scale of their breach, which the latter asserted was almost £23.2m.
The commission said the additional £6.56m would be considered “at a later time” and that “a further hearing will follow”, suggesting the outstanding matter would not be resolved before the end of the season.
It added: “The commission is acutely aware that there are many stakeholders – to name some: the PL, Everton, the Everton fans, all other Premier League clubs, the public – interested in the speedy determination of these disciplinary proceedings. Nevertheless, in fairness to the parties in these proceedings, the commission decided that the issues which remain cannot be dealt with in accordance with the timetable set out in the Standard Directions. The Standard Directions will not, therefore, apply to the remaining issues.”
www.telegraph.co.uk
==========================
Remarkably, the written reasons revealed that this was not the end of the case against Everton following a dispute between them and the Premier League about the scale of their breach, which the latter asserted was almost £23.2m.
The commission said the additional £6.56m would be considered “at a later time” and that “a further hearing will follow”, suggesting the outstanding matter would not be resolved before the end of the season.
It added: “The commission is acutely aware that there are many stakeholders – to name some: the PL, Everton, the Everton fans, all other Premier League clubs, the public – interested in the speedy determination of these disciplinary proceedings. Nevertheless, in fairness to the parties in these proceedings, the commission decided that the issues which remain cannot be dealt with in accordance with the timetable set out in the Standard Directions. The Standard Directions will not, therefore, apply to the remaining issues.”
Everton points deduction live: Latest reaction to Premier League's PSR verdict
Everton’s bid to avoid relegation has been dealt another blow having been deducted a further two points by the Premier League for breaching Profit and Sustainability Rules.
www.telegraph.co.uk
Slight correction.
They took 2 off for double jeopardy. Then one more off for cooperation and Ukraine war issues combined.
