Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Participation within this subforum is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

Ademola Lookman

Status
Not open for further replies.
Agree with Lookman deserving the start in front of Theo. Not doubting Theo at all though, proper nice guy and shouldn't be expected to carry the team alone.

Otherwise, i'd calm the positivity a bit: Mola was largely invisible apart from 2-3 contributions, and the excellent run into the box.

Here's the challenge, rather: Who is replacing Gylfi in the no. 10? Richy? Dowell? Gomes?
 
...certainly deserves a start but I wonder if Silva sees him as a left sided option in competition with Bernard.

Carragher correctly said in commentary yesterday how ‘brave and comfortable’ Everton are in passing the ball and keeping possession in tight areas. I suspect this is why he’s starting Bernard. He can link with Gomes et al who all have a real belief in their ability against the best opposition.

Lookman has a tendency to lose possession, so if he gets a start I imagine it will be in a home game where we might dominate anyway. I wouldn’t be surprised, though, if he’s starting on the left.

I think the key is to manage players. You have to appreciate football is not Fifa and just because you have a player with great skill doesn't mean you can just negate other aspects of the game. They are also not computer programmed data, they are people. If they are struggling defensively it will have an impact on the all round performance. The player needs to be managed properly and put on in situations where they have the best opportunity to show their ability.

So far it's hard to argue Silva isn't doing this. Walcott didn't have a great game yesterday, but watch his defensive work closely and you can see why he is an important player for us. He played an important role in limiting Chelsea's dangerous side. He works hard defensively, got the fitness, intelligence and experience to do so. I'm not sure that will ever be Lookman's game and currently he is a bit of a luxury, however a luxury that can have a big impact going the other way.

For me he was managed perfectly yesterday. When the pace had slowed and Bernard had tired he put him on. We needed a bit of a kick going the other way and we had a solid foothold in the game. He then quickly played another centre back behind him which meant Lucas Digne could look after the left side and he had more freedom. He was very dangerous in that time. He will have gained enormous confidence from it as opposed to the impact that may have been coming his way if we had lost the game in part down to his defensive ill-discipline.

As long as young players are involved most will be happy with this. I suspect Lookman will be much the same.
 
I think the key is to manage players. You have to appreciate football is not Fifa and just because you have a player with great skill doesn't mean you can just negate other aspects of the game. They are also not computer programmed data, they are people. If they are struggling defensively it will have an impact on the all round performance. The player needs to be managed properly and put on in situations where they have the best opportunity to show their ability.

So far it's hard to argue Silva isn't doing this. Walcott didn't have a great game yesterday, but watch his defensive work closely and you can see why he is an important player for us. He played an important role in limiting Chelsea's dangerous side. He works hard defensively, got the fitness, intelligence and experience to do so. I'm not sure that will ever be Lookman's game and currently he is a bit of a luxury, however a luxury that can have a big impact going the other way.

For me he was managed perfectly yesterday. When the pace had slowed and Bernard had tired he put him on. We needed a bit of a kick going the other way and we had a solid foothold in the game. He then quickly played another centre back behind him which meant Lucas Digne could look after the left side and he had more freedom. He was very dangerous in that time. He will have gained enormous confidence from it as opposed to the impact that may have been coming his way if we had lost the game in part down to his defensive ill-discipline.

As long as young players are involved most will be happy with this. I suspect Lookman will be much the same.

Couldn't disgree more.
If Walcott had defended the way he did yesterday in previous matches we would probably be sitting 6th now.
'He works hard defensively, got the fitness, intelligence and experience to do so.'
C'mon Catcher, you can't be serious.

Its not that he defended superbly against Chelsea, rather his positioning was much better.
It allowed the rest of the midfield and backs to set better lines.
I was surprised at first that he wasn't taken on, 1v1 more by Alonso and Kovacic.
But looking at it closely, the lads set up so well behind/across from him Chelsea were forced to recycle more often than they would have wanted.

But when it comes to 1v1, 2v2 and tracking players, Walcott is not 'an important player for us'. He's been more of a liability. Its not his natural game.
Silva has managed him very well in the last two matches, and for that Walcott had one of his better games. And not surprisingly results have been different.

Lookman is a very different story. The boy is becoming a man. Yesterday was an attempt at a mature performance, and he did it well.
In the short time he was on his defensive positioning was more difficult than Walcott's. The left side was much more open, he had to cover a lot more space, he worked well with Digne, Sig and Mina. If he keeps going this way, as he makes some tackles and gets his confidence up, he's going to be a better defender than Walcott has been, or ever will.
 
I didn't once say he was.

We area bloody weird set of fans though. We are on a good run of form, just stood toe to toe with one of the better teams in the league away from home and the first thing we want to do is change things up.

Our current set up is working. Walcott is on a poor run compared to the others, but if that's the team he thinks can compete (and it is being proved right so far) then why change it so quickly?

There is nothing wrong with what we are currently doing.

Even if we had just won the champions league we should still be looking to strengthen positions and certainly look to improve weak areas of the team...walcott has been below par.

Whose to say we wouldnt have won yesterday if lookman had the chance not Walcott...also having a better player or at least a more confident one in the side would peg back the opposition full back.

Walcott may as well have been unmarked.

Couldn't disgree more.
If Walcott had defended the way he did yesterday in previous matches we would probably be sitting 6th now.
'He works hard defensively, got the fitness, intelligence and experience to do so.'
C'mon Catcher, you can't be serious.

Its not that he defended superbly against Chelsea, rather his positioning was much better.
It allowed the rest of the midfield and backs to set better lines.
I was surprised at first that he wasn't taken on, 1v1 more by Alonso and Kovacic.
But looking at it closely, the lads set up so well behind/across from him Chelsea were forced to recycle more often than they would have wanted.

But when it comes to 1v1, 2v2 and tracking players, Walcott is not 'an important player for us'. He's been more of a liability. Its not his natural game.
Silva has managed him very well in the last two matches, and for that Walcott had one of his better games. And not surprisingly results have been different.

Lookman is a very different story. The boy is becoming a man. Yesterday was an attempt at a mature performance, and he did it well.
In the short time he was on his defensive positioning was more difficult than Walcott's. The left side was much more open, he had to cover a lot more space, he worked well with Digne, Sig and Mina. If he keeps going this way, as he makes some tackles and gets his confidence up, he's going to be a better defender than Walcott has been, or ever will.

The defensive part of a wide players game is becoming too much of a talking point i think.

If we want players to win games that doesnt mean we should be playing Aaron Lennon types who can track back but produce barely anything in attack.

If we had a peak Ronaldo on the right rather than Walcott then their left back would have had to stay back to cover for him...with Walcott he had no such worries.

I dont know if Lookman would have a similar effect but its worth giving him a go after his Leipzig performances + his cameos...
 

Agree with Lookman deserving the start in front of Theo. Not doubting Theo at all though, proper nice guy and shouldn't be expected to carry the team alone.

Otherwise, i'd calm the positivity a bit: Mola was largely invisible apart from 2-3 contributions, and the excellent run into the box.

Here's the challenge, rather: Who is replacing Gylfi in the no. 10? Richy? Dowell? Gomes?

If Gylfi is out vs Cardiff, drop Bernard central and let him win fouls on the edge of their box all day long.

Dowell can't play that role. He's not got it in him to press. Bernard can at least get on the ball and make something happen. An alternative like you say could be Richarlison.

But personally I'd go Walcott - Bernard - Lookman as the three behind the forward.
 
Based off what exactly? We are on a decent run of form right now regardless.

Managers don't play the wrong players for the hell of it. He will know when Lookman (or anybody else) deserves a chance or not. All we as fans can do is base it off what we see on the pitch and what exactly has Lookman done to deserve a chance? he is an option certainly and I do hope he gets a go but he has not played well enough to make his selection an obvious thing either.
How often did we see Phil fn Neville shoehorned in to a team when there were CLEARLY better options available? Yes, some managers have their favourites and will play them regardless. Not saying that this is Silva here but just that I disagree with that point.
 
Even if we had just won the champions league we should still be looking to strengthen positions and certainly look to improve weak areas of the team...walcott has been below par.

Whose to say we wouldnt have won yesterday if lookman had the chance not Walcott...also having a better player or at least a more confident one in the side would peg back the opposition full back.

Walcott may as well have been unmarked.

Yeah he has been below par for a couple of weeks. That's all.

Who is to say that Lookman started yesterday and he had an absolute mare? Who knows?

You are not pegging back Chelseas full backs regardless.
 
How often did we see Phil fn Neville shoehorned in to a team when there were CLEARLY better options available? Yes, some managers have their favourites and will play them regardless. Not saying that this is Silva here but just that I disagree with that point.

Were these not the heady days of finishing 5th and 6th?

Managers will play the team they think is the best. It's their head on the line after all.
 

Even if we had just won the champions league we should still be looking to strengthen positions and certainly look to improve weak areas of the team...walcott has been below par.

Whose to say we wouldnt have won yesterday if lookman had the chance not Walcott...also having a better player or at least a more confident one in the side would peg back the opposition full back.

Walcott may as well have been unmarked.



The defensive part of a wide players game is becoming too much of a talking point i think.

If we want players to win games that doesnt mean we should be playing Aaron Lennon types who can track back but produce barely anything in attack.

If we had a peak Ronaldo on the right rather than Walcott then their left back would have had to stay back to cover for him...with Walcott he had no such worries.

I dont know if Lookman would have a similar effect but its worth giving him a go after his Leipzig performances + his cameos...

Apart from when Walcott was played in one-v-one (and yes, it was a hard ball to take down, but if he had, he'd have been in, entirely because Alonso lost him). That's why he's useful.

But I agree entirely he needs to be taking those (half) chances as well.
 
My fear is if he keeps getting little cameos here and there he will look to move on in Jan which to be honest is fair enough. Boy wants to play and needs to be given a run.

Siggy's injury could put Bernie in the middle and Mola his chance on the wing but he has to take it.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Back
Top