Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Participation within this subforum is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

Ademola Lookman

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ok I take your point but name a game where Lookman started where he took by the scruff of the neck. Only time will tell whether the club have made the correct decision, In regards to Coleman’s limitations Richarlison has played well that side which to a degree has helped Coleman’s game. I don’t see the influence from Lookman. Silva sounds a more reasonable guy than Allardyce but he can’t make allowances for young players with questionable attitude.

Can you name a game when Walcott or bolasie to the game by the scruff? Yet they got many more chances
 

He's not though is he, having been born in the 20th Century and a professional footballer.

So quite clearly not doing any raping.

You really need me to clarify that I wasn’t accusing him of literally raping people on a training camp with professional footballers?
Well I wasn’t
I would also like to clarify that he didn’t pillage any villages, also I have no proof that lookman wasn’t doing his fair share of rowing and I cannot confirm 100% that he thought the boat was going to Germany .
Hope that clears everything up for you.
 
But it still boils down to 3 managers not rating him for one reason or another.

At RBL maybe he was up for it

On your 1st point, how highly do you rate those three managers? All three were only here for a short time and struggled. So why is their opinion on any player given weight? Especially when you factor in the risk associated with them playing a wildcard with their jobs on line, it’s much “safer” to play a Walcott.

On your second point, why?

Why would the lad be more up for it at one place and not here (if that’s the case)? It suggests the issue doesn’t lie with him, but lies with his current environment.

*’suggests’ being the key word.
 
My take on this is the lad doesn't want to play for us, Silva kept him last season but then came out and said he not giving it all in training. The kid had spat his dummy out and wants out, his contract running out. We dont have any control in this situation. He never once spoke of any love about this club. Let's not worry about him, he gone and I wish him the best
 
I'm disappointed in Lookman and Vlasic, I fear they may be getting rubbish advice from their entourages. They both may well end up as good players but at this stage they are stamping their feet and demanding to be played rather than earning it.

It's a shame, 2 young lads with good potential and we might see them have good careers.
 

Almost everyone outside of this forum realises this “bad attitude” is a load of BS when he’s been benched by much less talented players, and performed when played
Trust me, it isn't.
I know for a fact his attitude stinks.
Quicker this festering boil is lanced the better for everyone involved
 
celebrated like he's just caught a wiff of some ladies panty stank
clint_ew.gif
 
We don't have any players who are at top level 100% of the time. Lookman being up and down is no different than any of the other attackers.

If you're really interested in seeing when he played well and should have earned more minutes you can go look at the match threads from City away, Chelsea away and Bournemouth at home for starters.

What are you talking about you psycho lol

Are you honestly telling me there is no difference of levels between lookman and richarlison, Bernard, dcl and siggurson?

Do I really have to explain that to you?

He played well at city but he played on the left that game and he didn't play well enough to get ahead of richarlison.

What did he do against Chelsea that was so good? That will make me think wow! Thus lad beeds to start. That one dribble into the box? Get a grip man.

He did play well against Bournemouth but he followed it up with a absolutely terrible performance at Southampton where I forgot he was on the pitch most of the time.

That's Lookmans issue really he never kicked on. He'd look good one game then he'd do nothing for 5 games. Then look good one game and so on.
 
I don't really get the Lookman thing, never have, the lad has talent, he has never done it here, for whatever reason he has never got many chances, not done much when he has got them (a few flashes here and there) so we have moved him on for a tidy profit to a club he wants to play for who we probably won't cross paths with. Everyone wins.

I would be a bit annoyed if he was going to say Leicester or someone.

Yeah, at this stage it's probably for the best for him to get his move and for us all to move on

I rate Lookman and have backed him to get more play time, but currently it looks like it isn't going to work out. Let's get our money and just hope he doesn't end up embarrassing us by going on to be amazing
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Back
Top