TheBigIguana
Player Valuation: £100m
Disagree there. We honeymooned with him hard. Everyone liked him and they overlooked that he wasn't very good at a lot of stuff and instead chose to go all googly eyed over his first touch and his making us tick (whatever that means).I think there's a fair bit of revisionism here mate,
Lookman essentially left the club when he sent off by Allardyce. That was a mistake and Leipzig was a far better move for hom. I wrote this at the time, I understood his perspective and backed him up.
Where he went wrong, was he came back to Everton with the same attitude that he left- that we were being run by Allardyce and would not give younger players a chance. It was a mistake. Brands wanted to have him centralm in the squad, and so did Silva. In that pre-season he started games, and was on course to be 1st choice. Along wth DCL/Richarlinson they would have been the front line. Unfortunately, he didn't really want that, and he became a little pig headed and still wanted to leave.
As pre-season dragged on he lost his place to Walcott. Bernard then arrived.
In fairness to Bernard, it would also be unfair to describe him as "doing nothing" particularly in that 1st season. Bernard was good in a lot of games.
I agree with the idea young players want to play. Under Silva we had the youngest squad in the league playing games. Lookman wanted to leave, he didn't want to play. Kean wanted to play, but we couldn't drop another young striker who was just much better. In Kean's case it was unfortunate.
I do think we have to have some perspective, and we can't just fit events to suit a narrative. The Lookman situation was dissapointing, but it happens. The club made about 2.5 X what we paid for him for a lad that wanted away. We should have sold him the 1st summer Brands came for even more money than we did a year later.
And it isn't really important who he lost his place to originally as much as who got the minutes. Walcott got a lot too but unlike Bernard there is actually a case for having him play over Lookman. My whole point was if we actually involved him in the team he'd still be here. Choosing not to for a player who is honestly hardly at a PL level is a grievous mistake.
Think about the downhill effects of it. We had to sign Iwobi, who I like, but who is also not as good as Lookman, cost extra money and is probably on higher wages. We've spent an entire season underachieving because we had limited creativity in the squad as well. The depth in our squad is still not recovered from letting possible options like Vlasic and Lookman go. Maybe they'd have never stayed but what bothers me is we never even tried.
And your last point is right and what I was saying to start. We should have either sold him right away or actually made him a part of the team. We told him we were doing the latter to stop the former and it was all untrue. It cost us money and the player.