Funny that...when he finally played in place of Walcott a couple of games ago he did nothing ...
lol
Sad thing is despite all his missed chances, we look far better with Walcott in the team.
Funny that...when he finally played in place of Walcott a couple of games ago he did nothing ...
lol
Is this a serious reaction? Kyle Walker is a pretty decent defender and couldn't get near him and Walcott missed the best chance of the game that he served up.
Or maybe he´s a young winger who by their nature are like that? I don´t know how he´ll progress but very unfair to write him off when he clearly has potential.
He’s the only old fashioned, proper winger that we have. I’d say Bernard and Lookman are more inside forwards but Walcott hugs the touch line. I’m not saying Walcott is the answer but he certainly isn’t the problem.Sad thing is despite all his missed chances, we look far better with Walcott in the team.
Sad thing is despite all his missed chances, we look far better with Walcott in the team.
He hasn't started on the left where he's clearly more effective... yet.Shame he can’t play like that when he starts.....yet
Well he’ll be more of a liability then, surely
Sit on the bench for 5 matches, start a match. That cycle is difficult to perform consistently in too. I just see a promising young player who could become very useful for us. Nothing mythical about him.
Yeah he gets one chance from the start and one chance only then will get written off for another month if he doesn’t get a goal or assist. Give him 2 or 3 on the spin, a fair crack at displacing Walcott or Bernard, and he’ll make things happen.We're not going to start calling for him to start games again now, are we?
Come on.. we know how this goes chaps.
We're not going to start calling for him to start games again now, are we?
Come on.. we know how this goes chaps.