Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
- Status
D
Deleted member 28206
Guest
Are you really though.
BernieH
Player Valuation: £35m
Don't know why it's so hard to grasp for the contrarians.
D
Deleted member 28206
Guest
i heard he wormed out of his military service too, absolute maggot!!!!!!!!111
BernieH
Player Valuation: £35m
A bit, I wouldn't be if it was the RS
I also think that the ref knew the situation with Son's retaliation and knew if he stayed another Everton player would be on his case .That might have made him change it to red as well.
The binman chronicles
Player Valuation: £80m
Don't worry I've contacted Bob Geldof and he is that concerned with the wellbeing of Son that he has dropped Africa like a stone and is going to organise a concert to rally round him at this difficult time.
Kaiser Soysauce
Player Valuation: £10m
The hypocrisy in here! For years, we've been banging on about having a "snide" in midfield. Someone to get stuck in and make it rough for the opposition. Someone to pick up tactical bookings. Different now is it?
I don't condone what has happened, but if we were 1 nil up in a must win game, we'd all be calling for the same tactical foul. No one wants to see a leg break, but unfortunately, it happens.
I could quote these all day, but there are literally hundreds of posts akin to the above.
I don't condone what has happened, but if we were 1 nil up in a must win game, we'd all be calling for the same tactical foul. No one wants to see a leg break, but unfortunately, it happens.
I could quote these all day, but there are literally hundreds of posts akin to the above.
Billy Dean
Player Valuation: £70m
look at the vitriol aimed at Sergio Ramos for something far less dangerous and unintentional
It was a HORROR tackle.
Since when did a snide tactical foul involve a reckless lunge??? No one has been able to answer that point....
He could have pushed him, pulled his shirt, clipped him or whatever he liked to take the booking for the team. But no. Instead he launched into a tackle where the ball was miles away because he lost his head.
What bothers me is the entitlement top 6 clubs have to think it's somehow "clever" to make tactical fouls. They're praised for it whilst teams lower down the table wouldn't be. Their players are then protected by the media ala Son, and given leniency by the referees. Thus Son has no reservations about a pointless tackle from behind, until he saw the consequences. It was the result of arrogance.
Kaiser Soysauce
Player Valuation: £10m
We've seen our players do the same though and applauded it as it showed apparent desire. There is no denying that football is fickle and full of hypocrisy. How many people lauded Mirallas' tackle on Suarez? In fact, a better question to ask would be, who wanted Mirallas to actually snap him? Answer honestly please.
It's not hypocritical at all, it's just people like you not being able to understand fairly simple points and twisting them into something else entirely. There are maybe one or two posts where people are really going in on Son, the rest are just saying a red card is justified and there's no need to feel sorry for him. It's really very straightforward, he made a deliberate foul which ended up with a player being seriously injured. It was unfortunate but he is ultimately responsible for it, and I expect the ban will be upheld because it wasn't an incorrect decision. I don't want him tarring and feathering, but I don't think it's unreasonable to expect him to release a statement saying he's sorry and to serve the ban he's been given.
Kaiser Soysauce
Player Valuation: £10m
Agreed. My point was regarding hypocrisy, not the nature of the challenge.
- Status