D
Deleted member 38674
Guest
The phrase was 'no evidence', not 'insufficient'. That's some big spoon you're stirring with.
The word that >I< used was ‘insufficient’. I didn’t claim anyone else used that. No spoon involved. I said just because there is insufficient evidence to prove something doesn’t mean it didn’t occur.
Funny really, sort of brings the whole OJ, Michael Jackson cases full circle really doesn’t it? I got plenty of grief for saying they were found not guilty, yet plenty believe they did it. Mad.