Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

 

2019/20 Andre Gomes

Status
Not open for further replies.
The phrase was 'no evidence', not 'insufficient'. That's some big spoon you're stirring with.

The word that >I< used was ‘insufficient’. I didn’t claim anyone else used that. No spoon involved. I said just because there is insufficient evidence to prove something doesn’t mean it didn’t occur.

Funny really, sort of brings the whole OJ, Michael Jackson cases full circle really doesn’t it? I got plenty of grief for saying they were found not guilty, yet plenty believe they did it. Mad.
 
That psychological counselling that Spurs said they would offer son appears to have worked wonders !!

Yes looking at those training videos, yesterday, he now looks like he requires plastic surgery to have the smile removed from his kisser.
Seriously though spurs and Pochitino, have disgusted me with theirs actions and lack of respect to Gomes and our club.
 
The word that >I< used was ‘insufficient’. I didn’t claim anyone else used that. No spoon involved. I said just because there is insufficient evidence to prove something doesn’t mean it didn’t occur.

Funny really, sort of brings the whole OJ, Michael Jackson cases full circle really doesn’t it? I got plenty of grief for saying they were found not guilty, yet plenty believe they did it. Mad.

Why don't you log off, you melon.
 
Except that simply isn’t true. At all. The laws aren’t transferable but the argument is. There is a law in football which says you get a red card for endangering an opponent, it’s been posted on here literally dozens of times today. Kicking a player who then breaks their ankle because you knocked them off balance means you endangered them. It seems fairly clear cut to me.
So in theory every tackle is liable to ‘endanger an opposition’ and a red card as it could potentially lead to an injury?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JLW

The word that >I< used was ‘insufficient’. I didn’t claim anyone else used that. No spoon involved. I said just because there is insufficient evidence to prove something doesn’t mean it didn’t occur.

Funny really, sort of brings the whole OJ, Michael Jackson cases full circle really doesn’t it? I got plenty of grief for saying they were found not guilty, yet plenty believe they did it. Mad.
I watched that video an I first thought was him going on about Son crying. You jumped straight to racism before anything else. Like we all said if there was racism it’s sickening an he should be banned. Has it turns out the club have said he wasn’t so just admit your wrong. Instead of coming on an using terms like am pointing out our fans been racist before you even knew he was you massive weapon.
 

It’s not antagonistic posting.

If you can’t see why it’s utterly stupid for fans to suggest we go out and deliberately try to injure Son in the next game, then I’m not sure we’ll ever find common ground.

"Vive la Difference." This vintage passive aggression and bullet point questioning in posts is prima facie evidence that you'll never be one of us. Hope this helps.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top