D
Deleted member 28206
Guest
Which one you ignorant sluts is badmouthing this god.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol yes why not.Would you say the more athletic, akin to say NFL style athleticism could come in and be naturally more mobile / therefore better?
Rugby players often switch codes / go to NFL etc might be an avenue worth pursuing?
Lol yes why not.
I would have Tom Brady (with 2 months training with a football) over Gomes all day long,
Because when put in a role where he can actually play expansive football he’s quite decent? If he goes further than the centre circle this year he gets a frowny face sticker from Silva.Lol yes, `buy athletic players'. Sometimes football is simple,
So why did 98% of our fans demand and the board spent 25mill + massive wages on a geezer who
couldnt beat the kit men or cleaners at Finch Farm over 30 metres?
Prime era Tim Cahill wouldn’t be effective in this Silva team. He probably wouldn’t make the bench.Will give you another example.
Tim Cahill. Very limited player on the ball.
But his attributes incredible drive, massive engine, uniquely good in air for someone not tall, self confidence, inspired others, knew how to notch.
We won/drew so many tricky away games back in the day I would argue alot down to this tremendous player and what he brought. It was something different. Opposition didnt like playing against him.
These are the types of players that will get us top 6 then top 4. They are out there but we just loom for steroetypes.
Will give you another example.
Tim Cahill. Very limited player on the ball.
But his attributes incredible drive, massive engine, uniquely good in air for someone not tall, self confidence, inspired others, knew how to notch.
We won/drew so many tricky away games back in the day I would argue alot down to this tremendous player and what he brought. It was something different. Opposition didnt like playing against him.
These are the types of players that will get us top 6 then top 4. They are out there but we just loom for steroetypes.
There is an excellent article today about Dyche's massively overachieving Burnley team. They concede fewest goals from turnovers in their third etc etc They get to attack teams with a high press much quicker with long balls that expose lack of numbers at the back.
Yes, thats called when you 2-0 up v Bournemouth at home and they have given up.Because when put in a role where he can actually play expansive football he’s quite decent? If he goes further than the centre circle this year he gets a frowny face sticker from Silva.
Yes, thats called when you 2-0 up v Bournemouth at home and they have given up.
The crowd puurr at Gomes 40 yard balls and tell their mate next to him how great he is.
How about when you are 1-0 down at Anfield or Arsenal. Where does our hero do then?
Ps. Anyone remember 1995.
Bunch of dogs in centre mid Parkinson/Horne/Ebbrell. They were limited but had something about them, heart, desire.
The top teams didnt like playing against them.
We had leaders at the back Southall/Watson and a menace up front Ferguson.
Ohh, guess what we won the cup and beat the champions in the final.
Ah, I see you've answered the question about something that's actual real (that our midfielders seem to be told to play no further than the edge of the centre circle, unless assisting with creating overlaps wide) with some wonderful hypothetical situations. Albeit, ones that actually seem to ignore situations that have already happened.Yes, thats called when you 2-0 up v Bournemouth at home and they have given up.
The crowd puurr at Gomes 40 yard balls and tell their mate next to him how great he is.
How about when you are 1-0 down at Anfield or Arsenal. Where does our hero do then?