Theres no maybe about it, Chelsea love wasting money on garbo players.Ha Ha Ha Ha.
Yeah, that's why Chelsea will have to pay a minimum of £50M for him.
Maybe they like wasting that sort of cash?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Theres no maybe about it, Chelsea love wasting money on garbo players.Ha Ha Ha Ha.
Yeah, that's why Chelsea will have to pay a minimum of £50M for him.
Maybe they like wasting that sort of cash?
Even in all that dross Jorginho stands out.
He is your Iwobi.Even in all that dross Jorginho stands out.
Now that's numberwang lolGrelish scored 32 in 213 for Villa... so that is a ratio of [32/213=0.15023]
Gordon scored 4 in 62 for us so far... so that is a ratio of [4/62=0.06452]
If we get 100m/(0.15023/0.06452) then we've got the same relative value for the inflated Grelish price based on goal return
... so £42,947,480.53
£50m is great money for Gordon. You don’t need to dump on him to see that he hasn’t done much to justify that price.Ha Ha Ha Ha.
Yeah, that's why Chelsea will have to pay a minimum of £50M for him.
Maybe they like wasting that sort of cash?
Dont rubbish this lad...his talent (like many other Everton players in the past) will be sacrificed to get the board out of a hole they dug for the club. Dont make that task easy for them by dumping on the player.
Havertz? Great player!Chelsea's dealmaking has been pretty bad too. Kepa, Havertz, Werner, Pulisic, Lukaku, Ziyech... that's poor relative to money laid out.
They can afford the mistakes, is the thing. They can bomb with those purchases and then one or two of the 20 promising kids they have out on loan will come good and they can plug them in. Or just buy someone else.
To be fair mate you popped up with the fat waiter so I'll take anything you have to say with this in mind. ?No he's not! lol
If he was playing at Brentford we'd all be gobsmacked at Chelsea going in with almost £50m. He's an alright player who has been forced into a key position at the club due to terrible mismanagement and awful transfer policy. He should be out on loan a division or two down, but he has been thrust into the spotlight and delivered very little apart from running a lot. He's demonstrated clearly that his finishing, decision making and set piece taking leave an awful, awful lot to be desired, yet he does have potential to improve.
In my opinion he will never be a regular for England and his value will never be greater than it apparently is now.
Sell.
They do a great job of spending a lot on players who break down physically tooChelsea's dealmaking has been pretty bad too. Kepa, Havertz, Werner, Pulisic, Lukaku, Ziyech... that's poor relative to money laid out.
They can afford the mistakes, is the thing. They can bomb with those purchases and then one or two of the 20 promising kids they have out on loan will come good and they can plug them in. Or just buy someone else.
It's a pretty nuts record - but what's even more nuts is that Gordon could crack their top-ten most expensive ever signings.
52m on a finished Torres 11 years ago will never be beaten.It's a pretty nuts record - but what's even more nuts is that Gordon could crack their top-ten most expensive ever signings.
Oof.
None including Anthony Gordon, yet! The last one that did was Rooney, when he got the ball in the right place on the pitch you could literally hear the seats all round Goodison hitting the seat back, and that was at the age of 17!How many other current Everton players get you off your seat when they start running with the ball?
Personally, I’d keep him … unless his “head has been turned”
Horrible to see Lescott when he knew City were sniffing bigly
Gordon is one of the top young English talents as Greadlish was at Villa thus all of this interest.Imagine thinking Gordon is remotely as good as Grealish was at Villa