forget it, them big money men aren't interested in us!
the reason the kirkby stadium is so good, is not only the location is so viable for a stadium but because we ain't paying for it...
This loop idea has been hammered by an architecual expert anyway, all this propaganda put out about the emirates being on an 8 acre site and the loop being a 9 acre site...
http://www.evertonfc.com/news/archive/loopo-feasibility-analysis.html
if you read the thing on the everton OS you will see the emirates as a whole build needed something like 25 acres for safety and access reasons.
Just playing devil's advocate for a moment... you are aware that the expert the Board used to debunk the Loop option is on the books for the Kirkby work... no Kirkby Stadium, no fee? Just a thought.
And as for the Emirates, the total area alloted to the Stadium is 17 acres, 8 for the ground, 9 for circulation and access.
By bringing on the likes of HOK and WSP (at considerable expense) Bestway certainly seem confident that the Loop can be a viable option - why else would they spend the money? They're a commercial operation, they would have no interest in wasting cash on fatuous exercises that would only make them look daft.
Surely the Board have a duty, when it comes to the most momentous decision in living memory, to ensure that all options are fully investigated.
I've always been pro move, and pro Kirkby, but the manner in which this emerging proposal has been dealt with causes me some real concerns. It seems either irrational, or that some other agenda is being served.
A side note: just a little digging shows that Bestway are a little more than a cash and carry outfit. They own the United Bank, a growing property investment business, cement plants in addition to the retail and food packaging arms to the Business... they're no Tesco's, but they're not a corner shop either.
Bestway have already intimated that they are looking to establish an enabling development on land across from the loop which would be bridged by the concourse shown on the scribbles provided.
This could turn into a serious proposition (whether LCC meant it to or not), I believe it would be negligence of the highest order, a dereliction of duty, if the Board didn't allow the option to reach maturity before a final decision were made