jonnyboy316
Player Valuation: £35m
Come on mate, Garners injury came in the close season, that’s not a valid point. My point is Gilmour is younger, achieved more so far, yet both are the same age, Gilmour younger, yet we see Garner as one with potential for the future and Gilmour career is over, yet both are inhabiting the same space in their development at their respective clubs. I’m not slating either, I’m challenging the prevailing logic and
He has achieved little. You are giving him credit for a CL medal he contributed next to nothing towards. Like giving David May credit for Uniteds 1999 trebel season. Garner at least has one solid Championship season under his belt. Gilmour has nothing more than a handful of appearances for Chelsea and Scotland where he was beat and tidy. He is just another Barry Bannanreframing amongst players with clear parrells in their profiles showing the obvious contradiction.
He’s young mate, it’s my understanding Chelsea didn’t want to sell, but the lad himself said he wanted to move to try and get more game time. It’s up to him now, he has the technical ability but has to develop and progress, he’s still very young, i wouldnt rule out a move up the ladder in the future, but it’s up to the lad. It’s easy to comment on the present, it’s harder and braver to try and predict the future, that’s not a reason why we shouldn’t try and do it. It’s a bit of fun at the end of the day and if nothing else lads get all worked up and you trigger them to start threads like this. It’s all a bit of fun,
I like it, if you see something in a player have the guts to say it, it’s half the fun of this place and sure laugh a long if you drop a clanger. I like Billy though, he has a rare composure and technical ability.