CardinalSin
Player Valuation: £950k
No it wasnt a striker off for a defender. Heitinga didn't take up a defensive position, he took up Fellaini's holding midfield role while Fellaini then took up Jelavic's striking role. The formation didn't change, just the personnel to try and get something to work for us that hadn't been working up to the point of the substituion.Thats all fair enough mate and i don't disagree, it wasn't a megative or positve chancge as such, it simply a change, a "try something else which sometimes works and sometimes doesn't" kind of change.
If Fellaini had scored, or more certainly if his presence up there meant us creating chances that we weren't before which we scored from it would have been a good tactical sub.
The fact the sub scored a rare nay freak goal doesn't make it any better sub than it was.
It was still a striker off for a defender in midfield away to a Championship team in game we were supposedly going all out to try and win.
He could have subbed Mucha for Howard and Mucha scored from a goal kick, still wouldn't have been a good sub to make in a game we should have been trying to win rather than hoping to win.
Upsets happen, and people can say "it's only a championship team", but Bolton away in a cup tie is a tricky fixture. What if Moyes had thrown on Vellios for Osman, (striker for a midfield player), and gone 4-3-3 to chase the winner, we got overrun in midfield and conceded a late goal trying to chase the winner? Would that then have been seen as a good substitution or a bad substitution on here?
I think we both know the answer to that one!