Why is top 4 unrealistic?
Just look at the top four positions over the last ten years and at the same time look at the wage budget. They correlate quite well - which I assume you knew before. Leicester is obviously the outlier. Our opportunity for the top four depends on 3 of the top 6 clubs slipping on a banana peel. In addition, we have to compete with clubs like Leicester and Wolves. The only way we can become a stable top tier is to get a lot of money - even then it becomes difficult with today's rules.
Why would you call us 'winners' anyway for finishing 5-10th?
It was argued that results are all that matters - something I disagree with. I'd rather lose 3-2 than play 0-0. When you play football with your mates, you do not go for a barely 1-0 win. As a spectator, I'm also not interested in seeing two teams defending a 0-0 result. Or - the new trend - to play the ball backwards and sideways - with no direction.
Furthermore, I argue that our most likely position in PL is in the range of 5 - 10. Our median position is 8 - almost independent of the manager. So that's why I said that if we fall within this range by playing defensive football (catenaccio) then we are no winners. All we have done is achieve an expected position, and this by playing incredibly boring football.
I will always criticize CA for playing boring football, but that does not mean I do not recognize what he has achieved or that he is a good coach. I also think it is too early to criticize CA for his time in the EFC. But the football he stands for is unbelievably dull, and unappealing.