I'm not sure if its Everton being frustratingly average or just the current world situation we find ourselves in but it all feels a bit nouty in here recently.
One of the joys of using a forum (rather than something like Twitter) is it gives the opportunity to debate certain points, put across your own perspective or critically analyse the opinions of others.
We seem to be entering an environment where if one persons view differs from another, they are instantly castigated and placed into a neat little box on one side of the fence or the other.
Making a critical point about Carlo Ancelotti doesn't mean you want him sacked, just as making a positive point doesn't mean you're delighted with the current form/playing style - these are all just opinions, and we should be able to discuss the pros and cons of them in a constructive, meaningful way.
My personal opinion on Carlo is - I really like the man, I think he 'understands' Everton and I am proud to call him our manager. I was delighted when we appointed him and still very much want him to be our manager. That isn't to say that i'm not a little disappointed with the way our season has gone, I find some of his substitutions/team selections baffling and I really wish we had a semblance of style to our play.
I tend to think that it's merely a case of 'right man, wrong time'. If Carlo would have been appointed when Koeman was (a.k.a on the eve of a the biggest spending spree the club has ever seen) - I firmly believe that we'd be playing in the CL right now. Unfortunately, we appointed Carlo at a time when the squad was overloaded with non-athletic, non-motivated players and the purse strings had been tightened. Unless we see a massive upsurge in the amount we spend this summer, it will possibly be a struggle for Carlo next season too. In hindsight, in a perfect world we would have appointed a manager capable of motivating and improving average players into something better than previously shown - Unfortunately, I don't think Carlo is that manager.
When we appointed Brands, I seem to remember conversations (or maybe just a general overarching idea) that he would mould and formulate a particular playing style and personality throughout the club. This would essentially mean that managers were less important than the club, as the players would be purchased with a particular style in mind - and the managers would be almost interchangeable. Has this idea just been completely binned off?