Aston Villa earn £8m a year, but apparently we should be happy with a deal that 'could' reach as much as £16m or so over three.
LOL !
LOL !
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Aston Villa earn £8m a year, but apparently we should be happy with a deal that 'could' reach as much as £16m or so over three.
LOL !
No Villa get £5m, £1.3m less than us a year.
What's your source for Villa BANKING £8 million pound a year on their sponsorship deal? These press reports and club statements are usually very ambiguous, to say the least, and a lot of the time, the sum reported is related to performance.Aston Villa earn £8m a year, but apparently we should be happy with a deal that 'could' reach as much as £16m or so over three.
LOL !
What's your source for Villa BANKING £8 million pound a year on their sponsorship deal? These press reports and club statements are usually very ambiguous, to say the least, and a lot of the time, the sum reported is related to performance.
Besides, you seem to be the only person who thinks the "OVER £16 million" statement means that the exact figure we're likely to receive is below £16 million. Yet you're all too happy to throw around sloppy figures in relation to other clubs.
Ah yes, good point.
So they went from £8m a year, which is more than Elstone has ever managed to get close to for us, down to £5m, which is probably still the same amount we're guaranteed per year. Not sure where you get £6.3m per year from for us ?
Aston Villa, who are mid table, are earning about the same as we are. Ace.
We bring as much exposure to potential sponsors as villa do, there's a reason we both get the roughly the same amount.
Got the figures wrong obviously about us, we get slightly more as you know. But there's little difference in finishing 6th or 16th to a sponsor if they get the same amount of publicity.
I'd bet that we were on TV more than Villa last season, and have been more this year. That's the biggest exposure a club and sponsors as a result, can get.
We weren't, both us and villa where live 14 times last season. Newcastle and Sunderland the same.
http://www.premierleague.com/conten...eason-201213-TV-Broadcasting-distribution.pdf
I've already said it, it's a 25% increase on the last deal over the 3-year period. If we could increase all other incoming revenue (tv deal(s) excluded) by 25% for the next three years, I'd be both astounded and delighted.
That link doesn't include cup games, btw.
Very true maybe that explains why Newcastle get slightly more than us. They where in the Europa league last season and therefor were on TV more.
And they get slightly less.But we're talking about Villa.