no, they check the offside first and they agreed it wasn'tIf they had decided it was handball then it would have gone to the offside call on Richi, and I’m not sure if he offside or not?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
no, they check the offside first and they agreed it wasn'tIf they had decided it was handball then it would have gone to the offside call on Richi, and I’m not sure if he offside or not?
no, they check the offside first and they agreed it wasn't
If they had decided it was handball then it would have gone to the offside call on Richi, and I’m not sure if he offside or not?
anyone remember Dele Alli from 2 or 3 years ago, did an Anders limpar and punched it from over his head, no penalty, its only Everton.
Can anyone honestly say the RS don't get that if it was in front of the Kipites?
That’s never how it works tbh.
They've said they checked it and it was onside, why do people want to argue the unarguable so much? It looks onside too, you can se he's not beyond the final defender. The problem is that ridiculous screenshot doing the rounds which is about 5 frames after the pass was made.
Where have they said they checked it? Not saying it’s offside, I’m saying it looks inconclusive from what I’ve seen.
There were statements last night. Lampard also said he checked with the officials at the time and they confirmed it. The game also did not restart with that offisde, it started in another part of the field.
100% spot on. First incident was a fould on Southall. End of.Disagree
If VAR had been around they would have given a blatant foul on Southall
I mean come on this was about the second game of the season
I remember this and could not be leave the foul wasn’t given.
tbh while I can understand it because we have VAR, it's still pretty blatant and from the angle he's at there is a gap to Rodri. Whether he could see all of the ball - I think that's a fair enough debate - but if he wasn't sure (which he told Lampard he wasn't) then he should have gone to check anyway regardless of Kavanagh's mutterings.To be fair, I’m totally fine with the referee saying he couldn’t see it as he had 2 bodies in the way. I’m fine with that because they’re the instances VAR should help plug the gap in vision.
They'd have checked the offside only after it was given handball, as per VAR procedure.I know it wasn’t given as offside! I know it was a handball. I still don’t think they checked that offside call though. I’d like them to clarify.
This is nothing about Liverpool. It's about us being denied the opportunity to earn an important point, that would have moved us up a position in the table, through a diabolical decision for which there is no logical explanation.
They'd have checked the offside only after it was given handball, as per VAR procedure.
However, referee's call, seeimgly (according to Lampard) was that there was no offside - so you'd imagine that came from the lino on that side.