Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The attempt to try and explain why he didn't give a penalty is embarrassing. He was seduced by the first inconclusive still and that swayed his decision when looking at the conclusive still? What a load of bullsh/tListen to the kip of that
"What we have to learn is, erm in our 80k a year job erm, is when there's video footage of a blatant pen erm, or a picture of a blatant pen, erm, well erm, we need to ensure we come to the correct decision erm and give the penalty erm, but I thinkni can see why he got it wrong erm because he ignored the blatant video footage and the blatant photo footage and erm, picked this image instead which is still a blatant penalty but erm, I'm gonna say it looks inconclusive"
The baldy corrupt cheating little ferret
The attempt to try and explain why he didn't give a penalty is embarrassing. He was seduced by the first inconclusive still and that swayed his decision when looking at the conclusive still? What a load of bullsh/t
I just thought they had totally messed up, as when was there another close offside in that attack?Proper pissing me off the way City fans on twitter can’t understand that the offside decision they got WASNT against Richarlison before the handball.
I just thought they had totally messed up, as when was there another close offside in that attack?
They signalled for offside, but the ref made Ederson take it near the touchline, so can't have been for Richarlison in that first moment of ball being played through. So not sure what they were giving as offside. Just awful from the officials.
The attempt to try and explain why he didn't give a penalty is embarrassing. He was seduced by the first inconclusive still and that swayed his decision when looking at the conclusive still? What a load of bullsh/t
While that’s true, it is logical that the better sides are in and around the penalty area much more so they’re generally going to have more chances for penalties to be given.Good to see that we're not just taking this lying down and are actually trying to get some clarity surrounding why that wasn't given.
Lampard showed incredible nous and maturity to put the offside question mark to bed as quickly as possible, which the officials would have tried to hide behind, aided and abetted by that absolute fruit cake who manages City who wouldn't know what a bad refereeing decision was if it slapped him in the chops given how many he's had in his favour during his time in management.
This is just how football is sadly. It's not corruption per se as that would imply that there's money changing hands which I wouldn't necessarily agree with, but it's definitely at the very least 'soft' match fixing that the powerful clubs benefit from more or less unanimously.
You only need to look at how many penalties someone like Cristiano Ronaldo has scored in his career to understand that a club of Everton's size aren't really playing in the same sport as these self-appointed chosen clubs. Transfermarkt have him down as scoring 143 penalties and missing a further 29 from having taken his first one in the 2005/06 season, which is basically an average of 10 penalties a season. Everton are by and large lucky to get 5 a year.
I know a lot is made about our notoriously poor away form at the bigger clubs in the Premier League, but I wonder how many times we've been denied only because of the officials? The 3-3 at Stamford Bridge comes to mind when John Terry scored a late equaliser when he was so far offside he might as well have been in a different post code.
Anything ever actually come from formal complaints? The points are gone but a suspension for Mr Chris K would be something I supposeI see we’ve formally complained