Chris Kavanagh

[HumbleWedbetters]

I thought Richarlison was offside myself.

The ref signalled that to get play back underway too. They should have stuck to that story as that was clearly handball.

Overall I do think the slight offside was enough to fairly chalk the pen decision out.

The officials got that arse about tit.

well it wasn't so as much as you like to be controversial - its wasted, Cavanagh spent 2 minutes looking at a screen showing a ball hit his arm.... not looking at the offside lines.

 

[ossie_21]

I thought he was lined up to do the Burnley v Leicester game

Poor Leicester are about to get robbed, Chris is going to want to get Burnley at least a point if not all 3. He might not sleep okay if we aren’t in the relegation zone yet after that match.

 

[HumbleWedbetters]

All about opinions really isn't it?

do you feel really edgy making opposite views all the time? Today is Monday...... it is because yesterday was Sunday but im sure you will make the argument that in Hawaii its Sunday right now.

 

[BlueStevie35]

When Clattenburg of all people, given his history of BS decisions against us, is saying it was a shocker, then you know it’s a bad one

 

[HumbleWedbetters]

John Aldridge no fan either :

Chris Kavanagh should be demoted after nonsensical and shocking VAR performance

John Aldridge weighs in on the big refereeing talking points from Liverpool's draw with Tottenham his the first half of his weekly column

www.liverpoolecho.co.uk

"Harry Kane wasn’t premeditated but the way he’s gone in, it’s clumsy, he’s out of control and it’s a bone-breaker. For them not to see it and for Chris Kavanagh not to assess it and tell the referee is pretty shocking.

You knew straight away, you’ve seen Jurgen’s reaction. He doesn’t go like that unless it’s really bad. We’ve seen it for a second time, which is what VAR is for, and it’s an absolute joke. The Scotland captain gets sent off, the England captain stays on. Maybe that says everything."

as if Aldo would be bothered if it was just impacting us? The fact it makes Liverpool's job of winning the league harder is the only reason he's annoyed.

Lets remember - this the maggot who laughed and ruffled Brian Laws head after he scored an own goal in a game where football really didn't or shouldn't matter, this is the bloke who bullied a young lad to the point of suicide at Tranmere.....

Horrible man.

 

[Brennan]

Can you please give us some tips as to how 2 hours is sufficient enough to not feel aggrieved at being cheated out of points when it could send us down? Is there some sort of meditation app that helps with this?

Call me crazy but the longer time goes on the more angry I feel about this. I'm a rational person but this decision and many more like it is throwing the game into a big giant rubbish bin. I have watched Everton for near 40 years - this is as bad as i've felt after a game..... yes it has meant Liverpool have a lesser chancew of winning the league but lets forget about them - this is about us.

Given the choice of being relegated or surviving in a game which is corrupt - I would pick relegation every time. What's the point in being a fan in something that is false - unless you are a grown man who watches WWE wrestling.

Not what I said so not sure why you’re asking me.

 

[Alanbileysfeathercut]

All waiting for ref watch today.
Dermot will no doubt back the var saying the usual buzz words.
Means nothing.
Has there ever been an FA apology about poor refereeing?

 

[HumbleWedbetters]

We have to take this on the chin, as blatant as it was. If VAR had been around in 97/98 we would have been relegated then.
View attachment 157388

its not even comparable - if Var was around in 98/99 then yes that ball would have been seen as crossing the line, but if var was around a decision prior to this would have gone in our favour.

This penalty call was cheating..... simple as that.

 

[HumbleWedbetters]

Not what I said so not sure why you’re asking me.

you made the point that 2 hours seemingly should be enough time to not make angry comments - unless you made a complete hash of attempting to make a different point?.

I can only assume that what happened never made you angry - that fits in with people who want Liverpool to not win the league more than Everton to be safe or you just arent bothered really.

 

[Voodoo Billy]

Just had this from a friend who used to be a referee and who I have known for years and trust implicitly…

BTW I assessed Chris Kavanagh on numerous occasions when he was officiating in the local leagues on Sat/Sun a few years back and I know for a fact that he has no allegiances to either of the Manchester clubs.
He follows a far lower club from Yorkshire after his Grandad.

He doesn't necessarily need to support them though, if he lives there he might find it uncomfortable giving decisions against his local teams for whatever reason, being a coward is reason enough not to put him in that position.

 

[Brennan]

you made the point that 2 hours seemingly should be enough time to not make angry comments - unless you made a complete hash of attempting to make a different point?.

I said I didn’t think calling somebody things like a maggot was justified.

If you do then cool. Not sure why you’re feeling the need to quote a post from two days ago to tell me that though.

 

[Old Blue 2]

It was offside for me. They chop and change these measurements each week from elbow to toenail to whatever.

It just looked off, and that's what the ref signalled.

Maybe for you. Not for the rest of us.

City's No.3.

Believe/think what you like. Richy's onside.

Got it wrong again, eh, dave...

 

[HumbleWedbetters]

I said I didn’t think calling somebody things like a maggot was justified.

If you do then cool. Not sure why you’re feeling the need to quote a post from two days ago to tell me that though.

why isn't it justified??? its fully justified..... it was a corrupt decision... do you think people who are corrupt aren't maggots?

 

[Jeff Jones]

I wonder who would've taken the penalty.

 

[davek]

Maybe for you. Not for the rest of us.

View attachment 157515

City's No.3.

Believe/think what you like. Richy's onside.

Got it wrong again, eh, dave...

Exactly. City's number 3s left foot is behind Richarlion's right foot, and Richarlison's torso and head are ahead of his. So every which way that is a big decision to get wrong...and I dont think they did.