trueblue84
Player Valuation: £50m
Must've come from a lab in wuhan then...The study concludes:
"Although the evidence shows that SARS-CoV-2 is not a purposefully manipulated virus, it is currently impossible to prove or disprove the other theories of its origin described here. However, since we observed all notable SARS-CoV-2 features, including the optimized RBD and polybasic cleavage site, in related coronaviruses in nature, we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible. More scientific data could swing the balance of evidence to favor one hypothesis over another".
It seems confident that the virus hasn't been manipulated. It doesn't sound very confident in determining where the virus derived from. It talks about belief and hypothesis, and how more scientific date would be able to swing the balance to favour one hypothesis over another. It's literally admitting that it's own data isn't scientific enough to verify their own hypothesis or out rule another one.
Seriously... your belief is based in nothing more than people in the shadows out to get us and there being a lab in the city where it originated. Yet, scientists doing exactly what you'd want scientists to do (give an initial view based on scientific analysis but also requesting more research) are guessing?