Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lanolin said:
Do you not ask yourself how a government could come up with a scheme so brilliant that it fools the entire population of the world - bar a couple of thousand absolute crackpots - and orchestrates everything so well that the thousands of people involved all keep silent about it for 20 years afterwards, but couldn't arrange to put airline livery on the plane they were using? Come on man, just think for one second.
Click to expand...

Thats where I go with most theories. It takes an awful lot of unity, and an awfully big risk for seemingly not a great deal of reward.

There are some odd things about the Twin Towers mind. I mean the planes aluminium seems to slice through steal and concrete like a knife through butter, which I've always felt a bit odd. I'm sure there is an explanation for it mind.
 
Old Blue 2 said:
Well, going back to my previous post, and your lack of answers to the points I put to you, I have spoken to, interviewed many pilots over the decades, and what they have told me flies in the face of anyone evr pulling off the manoeuvres that those Boeing 7-series supposedly did.

Open your mind Jimmy, to all of the possibilities. Governments rely on people accepting what they spoon-feed to them.

ANother thing: passengers on Flight 93 supposedly phoned their loved ones on mobiles when at 20,000-30,000 feet. The mobile phone technology in September 2001 was not capable of transmitting signals from such height. Experts in that field did actuals tests to prove it was false.

There is too much garbage that has been fed to the public over this event, and you (i.e. everyone) have to have an open mind about it all.
Click to expand...
Mate I think about half of Americans think 9/11 was an inside job. As Chomsky points out, the fact that so many believe the government is capable of such an act yet do nothing about it is a bit disturbing.
There may be various discrepancies in evidence etc, as you would expect, but until someone can give me a viable reason as to why a country would blow up its own buildings then I’m not planning on wasting my time thinking about it anymore
 
Lanolin said:
Do you not ask yourself how a government could come up with a scheme so brilliant that it fools the entire population of the world - bar a couple of thousand absolute crackpots - and orchestrates everything so well that the thousands of people involved all keep silent about it for 20 years afterwards, but couldn't arrange to put airline livery on the plane they were using? Come on man, just think for one second.
Click to expand...
Also this ^^
 
Lanolin said:
Do you not ask yourself how a government could come up with a scheme so brilliant that it fools the entire population of the world - bar a couple of thousand absolute crackpots - and orchestrates everything so well that the thousands of people involved all keep silent about it for 20 years afterwards, but couldn't arrange to put airline livery on the plane they were using? Come on man, just think for one second.
Click to expand...

Thousands of people remained silent about the work they did at Bletchley Park re Enigma in World War 2 for decades...

Don't have a closed mind about the lengths Governments will go to, to achieve their ends.

Oh also, go read up about 'Operation Goodwood', as to what a Government would be prepared to do.
 

roydo said:
What did I see, live on telly, flying into the 2nd tower then?
Click to expand...

I believe NOT a civil airliner.

And was it live on telly?

roydo, take the time to look up the CNN view of the aircraft flying into the second tower (it comes from directly above), and then look at the shots taken by eyewitnesses (it comes from the side). When I saw the two, I just shook my head in disbelief. We are/were being fed all kinds of garbage.
 
Lanolin said:
Do you not ask yourself how a government could come up with a scheme so brilliant that it fools the entire population of the world - bar a couple of thousand absolute crackpots - and orchestrates everything so well that the thousands of people involved all keep silent about it for 20 years afterwards, but couldn't arrange to put airline livery on the plane they were using? Come on man, just think for one second.
Click to expand...
There is enough evidence about 9/11 that questions the official story entirely. Whether you choose to believe it or not of entirely up to people , that's the point of a theory so to speak.

I've heard versions that explain the motivations for the attack. I've seen plenty of information in regards to disproving the official version of events that is quite damning .

Can I tell you what really happened and why? Not for a moment I can. But there is enough evidence out there that's science based that makes me believe there is more to it then simply terrorism.
 
Old Blue 2 said:
I believe NOT a civil airliner.

And was it live on telly?

roydo, take the time to look up the CNN view of the aircraft flying into the second tower (it comes from directly above), and then look at the shots taken by eyewitnesses (it comes from the side). When I saw the two, I just shook my head in disbelief. We are/were being fed all kinds of garbage.
Click to expand...

The second one was, yeah. Distinctly remember being in a customers office watching it. Footage was from the pavement, the plane was sort of wobbling and ploughed into the tower near the top.
 
Kenshin said:
There is enough evidence about 9/11 that questions the official story entirely. Whether you choose to believe it or not of entirely up to people , that's the point of a theory so to speak.

I've heard versions that explain the motivations for the attack. I've seen plenty of information in regards to disproving the official version of events that is quite damning .

Can I tell you what really happened and why? Not for a moment I can. But there is enough evidence out there that's science based that makes me believe there is more to it then simply terrorism.
Click to expand...
No I understand the reasons why people are sceptical about certain things (although I don't believe there's anything untoward about them), I was just talking about that specific point. It's just utter madness to use that as part of a conspiracy theory, it makes literally no sense whatsoever, you'd have to be seriously hard of thinking to say that was evidence of anything.
 

Lanolin said:
No I understand the reasons why people are sceptical about certain things (although I don't believe there's anything untoward about them), I was just talking about that specific point. It's just utter madness to use that as part of a conspiracy theory, it makes literally no sense whatsoever, you'd have to be seriously hard of thinking to say that was evidence of anything.
Click to expand...
Fair enough.
 
We’re going DEEP down in this thread today!

fc0c9962176e9039cf1a9b9471237c88.gif
 
Old Blue 2 said:
I believe NOT a civil airliner.

And was it live on telly?

roydo, take the time to look up the CNN view of the aircraft flying into the second tower (it comes from directly above), and then look at the shots taken by eyewitnesses (it comes from the side). When I saw the two, I just shook my head in disbelief. We are/were being fed all kinds of garbage.
Click to expand...
Pics or it didn't happen - isn't that the correct phrase
 
For me, it's the collapse of WT7 that is the biggest indicator of the attack being something other than the 'official narrative'. You have to jump through several hoops to explain the manner in which that building collapsed, and many people continue to put forward such 'legitimate' explanations, but I'm not buying it. That's a controlled demolition if ever there was one.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register
Back
Top