Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
There’s so much white noise surrounding the events of 9/11 now that trying to parse the truth is very difficult. For every “expert” that comes up with a theory on whether something could/could not happen, there’s 100 more with counter theories.

It’s that same white noise, though, that probably hides the real conspiracies. The many people who used the days events to bury bad news and wrongdoings. Lest we forget about:


Wherever there is tragedy, there will be people who exploit that tragedy for themselves.
 
View attachment 98096
lollollollollol Five smiler here @Old Blue 2 Great work. lol

10 for you Jimmy. Tubular aluminium going through concrete and steel columns over a foot in thickness? Do me a favour! Towers 1 & 2 did not fall on their own footprint through an aircraft hitting those towers.

And:
'The ground swallowed Flight 93 that day. The plane, its remaining 5,500 gallons of fuel, every passenger, all their belongings, every chair, drink cart, window, door, panel and screw.'

Just take a step back and think about the above, Jimmy. Then ask yourself 'What's going on?'
 


Just take a step back and think about the above, Jimmy. Then ask yourself 'What's going on?'
What would be the rationale in having a Flight 93 story/scenario, with all the costs and risks, where a plane crashed apart from a small group who ‘fought back’?

Would it be worthwhile? Is the flight meant to be made up entirely and as such why haven't the company, engineers, ATC, baggage handlers etc. said its fake?

If it was in fact a real plane, where has it gone and what about the people on board? How was the massive scene made without any real notice?

From my personal experience, 99/100 it is the most obvious answer which is in fact the correct one. The plane went down almost vertically and crashed at speed.

There was debris as well as reported and seen albeit not all visible. You've got quotes on the internet from the Coroner that are used by conspiracy theorists...

... that directly contradict comments he made to the media. Why? That's before talking about the Pentagon and the Twin Towers where there was debris found.
 
10 for you Jimmy. Tubular aluminium going through concrete and steel columns over a foot in thickness? Do me a favour! Towers 1 & 2 did not fall on their own footprint through an aircraft hitting those towers.

And:
'The ground swallowed Flight 93 that day. The plane, its remaining 5,500 gallons of fuel, every passenger, all their belongings, every chair, drink cart, window, door, panel and screw.'

Just take a step back and think about the above, Jimmy. Then ask yourself 'What's going on?'
The steel at the top of the building was not a foot thick though. The material from the base to the top differed as it got higher for obvious reasons.

They were also smaller pieces welded and bolted together as opposed to longer strips.

Google speed tests and you will find that there is plenty of evidence from science and engineering departments at several top universities that studied this.

They found out at the speed the planes were likely going coupled with an explosion on contact that it would dismantle the steel. Also it led to the subsequent demise of the building.

It should be noted that when the towers were being built they had to change the plans three times due to problems with the design.

Some even questioned the materials being used and if it could really withstand an impact as that was studied based on other aircraft hitting other buildings back then.

Finally the flame retardant they used apparently was later discontinued elsewhere as they noticed that although it prevented burning its use to coat metal was concerning.

Google the building of the twin towers and its flaws. Many websites have information circa 2001
 
10 for you Jimmy. Tubular aluminium going through concrete and steel columns over a foot in thickness? Do me a favour! Towers 1 & 2 did not fall on their own footprint through an aircraft hitting those towers.

And:
'The ground swallowed Flight 93 that day. The plane, its remaining 5,500 gallons of fuel, every passenger, all their belongings, every chair, drink cart, window, door, panel and screw.'

Just take a step back and think about the above, Jimmy. Then ask yourself 'What's going on?'
OK. So, the planes didn't crash into the towers...

So, what made the massive hole in the side of both buildings?

An office block full of thousands of workers didn't question the hundreds of fellas installing the amount of explosives to the internal columns of the building to do a controlled demolition? Where they all in on it and were so committed they were happy to die so the USA could invade Iraq?

Regarding livery on the aircraft. I remember listening to an anecdote from Alan Davis on QI, where he says he was sat in a restaurant looking out the window when he saw a crash. He went outside to tell the police he saw everything and would give a statement. The officer said "OK, what colour was the moped involved?". He confidently said it was blue. The office told him it was silver. Was to do with how eye witnesses are surprisingly unreliable when describing detail.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Back
Top