Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
trueblue84 said:
OK. So, the planes didn't crash into the towers...

So, what made the massive hole in the side of both buildings?

An office block full of thousands of workers didn't question the hundreds of fellas installing the amount of explosives to the internal columns of the building to do a controlled demolition? Where they all in on it and were so committed they were happy to die so the USA could invade Iraq?

Regarding livery on the aircraft. I remember listening to an anecdote from Alan Davis on QI, where he says he was sat in a restaurant looking out the window when he saw a crash. He went outside to tell the police he saw everything and would give a statement. The officer said "OK, what colour was the moped involved?". He confidently said it was blue. The office told him it was silver. Was to do with how eye witnesses are surprisingly unreliable when describing detail.
Click to expand...
Yep its why cops and investigators usually wants multiple accounts if its possible
 
Tea_drinker said:
Why has footage of the plane crashing into the Pentagon never been seen?
Click to expand...
Not sure if you are joking but the pentagon released footage in 06 and later on additional footage when people made a request through the freedom information act.

I mean you can type plane hitting pentagon to find various sources with the footage.

I think the lack of the gym really did mess up your brain.
 
SteveSC said:
Not sure if you are joking but the pentagon released footage in 06 and later on additional footage when people made a request through the freedom information act.

I mean you can type plane hitting pentagon to find various sources with the footage.

I think the lack of the gym really did mess up your brain.
Click to expand...
You mean that grainy footage of a millisecond of sliver of silver? From the most CCTVd up place on the planet? Hahahaha
 
Tea_drinker said:
You mean that grainy footage of a millisecond of sliver of silver? From the most CCTVd up place on the planet? Hahahaha
Click to expand...
What footage are you expecting then? Do you think someone sits outside all day every day filming the entire building?

The DC hit happened so fast and there were no TV crews present. The reason Manhatten had plenty of footage well because all of the TV crews are there. And it just so happened that day there was a report on road works so a crew was down the street.

There was also enough time between hits for people to mobilise
 

SteveSC said:
What footage are you expecting then? Do you think someone sits outside all day every day filming the entire building?

The DC hit happened so fast and there were no TV crews present. The reason Manhatten had plenty of footage well because all of the TV crews are there. And it just sonhappened that day there was a report on road works so a crew was down tbe street.
Click to expand...
You see better footage of fights in dodgy nightclubs on the echo website. There is no way that the pentagon had one grainy CCTV camera pointed at it. The millisecond of clip they released is rubbish.
 
Tea_drinker said:
You see better footage of fights in dodgy nightclubs on the echo website. There is no way that the pentagon had one grainy CCTV camera pointed at it. The millisecond of clip they released is rubbish.
Click to expand...
Cctv in 2001 was not that great. Just watch any of those shows about cops solving or trying to solve murders based on evidence from cctv. The tech just wasn't there.

I know how crap they were personally given my profession then too.

Very unreliable even the top of the range was limited.
 
SteveSC said:
Cctv in 2001 was not that great. Just watch any of those shows about cops solving or trying to solve murders based on evidence from cctv. The tech just wasn't there.

I know how crap they were personally given my profession then too.

Very unreliable even the top of the range was limited.
Click to expand...
You honestly believe that in 2001 that was the best quality CCTV pointed at the pentagon?
 

Tea_drinker said:
You honestly believe that in 2001 that was the best quality CCTV pointed at the pentagon?
Click to expand...
You have no idea how the US government work and what tech they have do you?

Why would they hold better footage if it was simply the outside of the building being filmed. Cop on thats just nuts.

That is what they had.

Having worked on contracts for the US government i can tell you their tech outside of the military and on buildings is not all that special.

They have other tech on the fences and gates and inside the building. The cctv cameras were at the time the best on the market mate.

Since then they have upgraded. There are not many companies dealing in the type of stuff they need on a building like that and.i know the guys who own 3 of them
 
SteveSC said:
You have no idea how the US government work and what tech they have do you?

Why would they hold better footage if it was simply the outside of the building being filmed. Cop on thats just nuts.

That is what they had.

Having worked on contracts for the US government i can tell you their tech outside of the military and on buildings is not all that special.

They have other tech on the fences and gates and inside the building. The cctv cameras were at the time the best on the market mate.

Since then they have upgraded. There are not many companies dealing in the type of stuff they need on a building like that and.i know the guys who own 3 of them
Click to expand...
That cctv would not prove anything in a court of law in any trial. Therefore there is nothing but slim eye witness evidence that it actually happened.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register
Back
Top