Oh, I agree. I'm merely suggesting that the more recent 'no timeframe' comment could be a result of a changing situation based on new information.I think the clubs messaging has been poor. It was initially that he had only been subbed against Arsenal as a precaution.
He needs to take as long as he needs but the club need to manage expectations properly as well, especially since we are so desperate for points and positive news.
It's not ideal, however I think the club have probably, in all good faith, gave a timeframe they believed to be correct, and for whatever reason it's not changed.
Whether the original timeframe was ever a sensible prediction is another question, entirely.