But it's not insulting. Why would watching cartoons be an insult.
But it's not insulting. Why would watching cartoons be an insult.
….terrific finish for the goal that wasn’t. Must be a while since he played 90mins.
Goodisongang
Player Valuation: £20m
Very defensive about it mate
It wasn't a foul in a million years. I dont care if he went down or not.
If we actually want that to be a foul then I dont want to watch this sport anymore. Its becoming an absolute farce and unwatchable with var
Goodisongang
Player Valuation: £20m
Oh I fully agree btw, var and the now whole none contract made this sport a joke years ago, but in the modern day, if a player rushes in like the and doesn't touch the ball, it's only going one way
There were lots of similar incidents in the match that were not fouls. How can anyone possibly say the referee made a clear and obvious error
VAR is just an added tool in football to favour big teams. It has made the big team bias in the game the biggest it has ever been.
Goodisongang
Player Valuation: £20m
Aye, but when a goal is involved they go overboard in checking.
That "foul" is probably played on 9 tomes out of 10 during the game
So how was it correctly disallowed then.
Hinchcliffe's Corner
Player Valuation: £35m
He's all over the show here.
Which is exactly the problem with VAR. Zero consistency with decision making and the decision often depends on what shirt the player is wearing.
Goodisongang
Player Valuation: £20m
Because he never touched the ball. It's soft but it's the modern game.
Even if he scored, and we go on and get a point.
What about the rest of my original point?.
Goodisongang
Player Valuation: £20m
Var has ruined the game completely.
You can't celebrate properly anymore because your always conscious if it's going to stand or not.
But it can't be the modern game if you just called it a "foul" and said 9/10 times it's not given. How are you defending the decision to disallow?
Fairly certain you just flat out didn't watch the game and didn't even know the incident.
Goodisongang
Player Valuation: £20m
As I said, when a goal is involved they are looking for any little thing to disallow it, when that happens just in general play they'll let it run.
Why are you arguing about a goal that was disallowed instead of arguing about anything else I said? Because I'm right about him not being a match winner and not scoring enough???
Thanks for playing.
But he would score more goals if they weren't wrongly disallowed...
You're the only person on here, the broadcasting team and on Sky Sports News that thinks that goal should have been disallowed.
You're either an RS scumbag or too embarrased to say you didn't watch the game and didn't see "Goal - Dominic Calvert-Lewin" so thought you'd just pile straight into your favourite thread.
Which one is it?
