Should be moulded into a winger or a wing back. Fast, strong, athletic, good on the ball but cant finish to save his life
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You realise you are now going to be accused of comparing him to Shearer and Henry.In his first 5 seasons Alan Shearer played 118 games and scored 23 goals(First Division with Southampton), he didn't turn out to shabby did he,imagine these days he'd be sent to the knackers yard for stats like that.
Thierry Henry played 105 and scored 20 for Monaco in his first 5 seasons...The list goes on.
It's too early too write this lad off
Of course you are. You never gave Barkley any credit for anything and you are exactly the same with DCL. You're writing a player off who's just turned 21 a couple of weeks ago. A striker who is first choice for England U21s.
It's horrible to see how some our fans treat our young players. Luckily you only ever get to do it on an internet site but sadly there's loads like you that go the match too.
Yet he's on par with our £45mill man for assists and goals having been played on the wing, lone striker, and wing back.
Our fans are always hypercritical of our young players, expecting more from them, and it masks the fact that most of the senior players need to be ousted way before the kids do.
Been like that for years and is a huge problem
You realise you are now going to be accused of comparing him to Shearer and Henry.
Rooneys goal record for us when he was young wasn't good so statistically DCL might not be very different... but you can see other parts of their game and everyone knew Rooney was going to the top... point is you have to spot something special in a young player and i can't see anything special in DCL, Barkley had that something special , the ability to carry the ball, shoot from distance with both feet ... those were his special attributes that made him worth developing ... and even he didn't improve enough.I just don't see anything that stands out and catches my eye . Lookman shows a very good touch and turn of pace and has shown he can hit a ball from distance as well as having very quick feet and is good in tight areas. That caught my eye and shows potential . DCL shows he can't hit the target and doesn't have conposure. He can run fast in a straight line and is very fit and can challenge in the air ( only off GK kicks tho) but these traits aren't hard to find and don't really stand out as being good enough to balance out the weak parts of his game. Cahill wasn't a technically good player and he got by on determination , attitude, and heart , all qualities which DCL has. Cahill wouldn't have made it with just these tho, he was immense in the air both defending and attacking and scored goals in tight games (like yesterday) DCL doesn't have the same knack and tbh not many do... it's rare and costs a lot of money. DCL doesn't have anything that stands out IMO , if he were to play for westham for example and we wanted to buy him , how much would you spend? 5m? 10m? Because that's what I would class him as... he is a Watford , stoke level player or at least he will be eventually. He will be a prem player but not a good one
Thats exactly what the guy didnt do. He put forward 2 names as exampes of players who didnt have fantastic scoring records in their early years but turned out prolific. At no stage did he compare their games to DCL.You do realise that he has just used both shearer and Henry as a comparison don't you?
I just don't see anything that stands out and catches my eye . Lookman shows a very good touch and turn of pace and has shown he can hit a ball from distance as well as having very quick feet and is good in tight areas. That caught my eye and shows potential . DCL shows he can't hit the target and doesn't have conposure. He can run fast in a straight line and is very fit and can challenge in the air ( only off GK kicks tho) but these traits aren't hard to find and don't really stand out as being good enough to balance out the weak parts of his game. Cahill wasn't a technically good player and he got by on determination , attitude, and heart , all qualities which DCL has. Cahill wouldn't have made it with just these tho, he was immense in the air both defending and attacking and scored goals in tight games (like yesterday) DCL doesn't have the same knack and tbh not many do... it's rare and costs a lot of money. DCL doesn't have anything that stands out IMO , if he were to play for westham for example and we wanted to buy him , how much would you spend? 5m? 10m? Because that's what I would class him as... he is a Watford , stoke level player or at least he will be eventually. He will be a prem player but not a good one
You realise you are now going to be accused of comparing him to Shearer and Henry.
You do realise that he has just used both shearer and Henry as a comparison don't you?
what's wrong with having a Danny Welbeck type in your squad?Our very own Danny Welbeck